Strikes, nurses and the law in the UK

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 269-276

  Dimond, Bridgit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

law; nurses; strikes; UK

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL ETHICS; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; REVIEW; ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING (GREAT BRITAIN); TRADE UNION; UNITED KINGDOM;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; LEGAL APPROACH; ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING (GREAT BRITAIN);

EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE; ETHICS, NURSING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALPRACTICE; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; STRIKES, EMPLOYEE;

EID: 0031182117     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096973309700400402     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Pitt G. Employment law, second edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1995.
2. Secretary of State v. ASLEF (No. 2) [1972] 2 All ER 949.
3. Dimond B. Contracts of employment, the law and the nurse. Br J Nurs 1995; 4: 674-675.
4. Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. London: HMSO, 1992.
5. Painter RW, Holmes A, Migdal S. Cases and materials on employment law. London: Blackstone Press, 1995.
6. Lister v. Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co. Ltd. [1957] 1 All ER 125.
7. Professional conduct rules. Statutory Instrument 1993 no. 893.
8. Dimond B. Can a midwife lawfully strike? Mod Midwife 1995; 5(4): 6-7.
9. Castledine G. Should nurses strike? Br J Nurs 1995; 4: 529-529.
10. Scott H. Why industrial action by nurses is not justified. Br J Nurs 1995; 4: 613-614.
11. The Royal College of Nursing and industrial action. (Reorder no. 00623) London: RCN, 1996.