Comparison of induced polarization and controlled-source audio-magnetotellurics methods for massive chalcopyrite exploration in a volcanic area

Geophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1087-1096

  Basokur, A T ^a   Rasmussen, T M ^b,c   Kaya, C ^d   Altun, Y ^e   Aktas, K ^d  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

^d GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF MINERAL RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION   (Turkey)

^e Demir Export AS   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER COMPOUNDS; GEOLOGY; INFILL DRILLING; ORE DEPOSITS; PHASE MEASUREMENT; POLARIZATION; PYRITES; VOLCANOES; ZINC SULFIDE; ACOUSTIC LOGGING; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; INDUCED POLARIZATION LOGGING; MINERAL EXPLORATION; TELLURIC PROSPECTING;

APPARENT RESISTIVITY; AUDIO MAGNETOTELLURICS; CONTROLLED SOURCE; GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION; INDUCED POLARIZATION; NORMALIZED IMPEDANCE; TRANSITION FIELDS; VISUAL INSPECTION;

MAGNETOTELLURICS; ORE DEPOSIT GEOLOGY;

CHALCOPYRITE PYRITE SPHALERITE ORE BODIES; CONTROLLED SOURCE AUDIO MAGNETOTELLURICS METHOD; DIPOLE DIPOLE INDUCED POLARIZATION METHOD;

CHALCOPYRITE; CONTROLLED SOURCE AUDIOMAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; INDUCED POLARIZATION; MAGNETOTELLURIC SOUNDING; MAGNETOTELLURICS; MASSIVE SULPHIDE; MINERAL EXPLORATION;

EID: 0031180203     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444209     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Basokur, A. T., 1994a, Definitions of apparent resistivity for the presentation of magnetotelluric sounding data: Geophys. Prosp., 42, 141-149.
2. _ 1994b, Reply to comment on "Definitions of apparent resistivity for the presentation of magnetotelluric sounding data" by L. Szarka: Geophys. Prosp., 42, 989-992.
3. Boerner, D. E., Wright, J. A., Thurlow, J. G., and Reed, L. E.. 1993, Tensor CSAMT studies at the Buchans Mine in central Newfoundland: Geophysics, 58, 12-19.
4. deGroot-Hedlin, C., and Constable, S., 1990. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data: Geophysics, 55, 1613-1624.
5. Cagniard, L., 1953, Basic theory of the magnetotelluric method of geophysical prospecting: Geophysics, 18, 605-653.
6. Constable, S. C., Parker, L. P., and Constable, C. G., 1987, Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data: Geophysics, 52, 289-300.
7. Kellett, R., Bishop, J., and Van Reed, E., 1993, The effects of source polarization in CSAMT data over two massive sulfide deposits in Australia: Geophysics, 58, 1764-1772.
8. Pelton, W. H., Ward, S. H., Hallof, P. G., Sill, W. R., and Nelson, P. H., 1978, Mineral discrimination and removal of inductive coupling with multifrequency IP: Geophysics, 43, 588-609.
9. Schmucker, U., 1970, Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Bull. 13, Univ. of Calif. Press.
10. Spies, B. R., and Eggers, D. E., 1986. The use and misuse of apparent resistivity in electromagnetic methods: Geophysics, 51, 1462-1471.
11. Szarka, L., 1994, Comment on "Definitions of apparent resistivity for the presentation of magnetotelluric sounding data" by A. T. Basokur: Geophys. Prosp., 42, 987-988.
12. Yamashita, M., 1987, Software and hardware design of controlled-source audio-frequency magnetotelluric (CSAMT) system and test survey: Phoenix Geophysics Limited company report.
13. Zonge, K. L., and Hughes, L. J., 1991, Controlled-source audio-frequency magnetotellurics: in (Nabighian, M. N., Ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, Vol. 2, Application, parts A and B: Soc. Expl. Geophys.