Conflicting objectives in chemotherapy with drug resistance

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 707-724

  Costa, M I S ^a   Boldrini, J L ^b  

^a Labs Nac de Comp Cie   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RESISTANCE; CELL DIVISION; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESISTANCE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICS; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; TUMOR GROWTH;

EID: 0031177737     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02458426     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Coldman, A. J. and J. H. Goldie. 1983. A model for the resistance of tumor cells to cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Math. Biosci. 65, 291-307.
2. Coldman, A. J. and J. H. Goldie. 1986. A stochastic model for the origin and treatment of tumors containing drug-resistant cells. Bull. Math. Biol. 48, 279-292.
3. Costa, M. I. S., J. L. Boldrini and R. C. Bassanezi. 1992. Optimal chemical control of populations developing drug resistance. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 9, 215-226.
4. Costa, M. I. S., J. L. Boldrini and R. C. Bassanezi. 1994. Optimal chemotherapy: a case study with drug resistance, saturation effect and toxicity. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 11, 45-59.
5. Costa, M. I. S., J. L. Boldrini and R. C. Bassanezi. 1995a. Drug kinetics and drug resistance in optimal chemotherapy. Math. Biosc. 125, 191-209.
6. Costa, M. I. S., J. L. Boldrini and R. C. Bassanezi. 1995b. Chemotherapeutic treatments involving drug resistance and level of normal cells as a criterion of toxicity. Math. Biosci. 125, 211-228.
7. Costa, M. I. S. and J. L. Boldrini. 1997. Chemotherapeutic treatments: a study of the interplay among drug resistance, toxicity and recuperation from side effects. Unpublished manuscript.
8. Eisen, M. 1978. Mathematical Models in Cell Biology and Cancer Chemotherapy. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 30. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
9. Goldie, J. H. and A. J. Coldman. 1979. A mathematical model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat. Rep. 63, 1727-1733.
10. Harnevo, L. and Z. Agur. 1992. Drug resistance as a dynamic process in a model for multistep gene amplification under various levels of selection stringency. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 30, 469-476.
11. Kirk, D. 1970. Optimal Control Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Leitmann, G. 1974. Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Many Player Differential Games, International Centre for Mechanical Sciences Course Lectures, No. 190. Udine, Italy: Springer-Verlag.
13. Murray, J. M. 1990a. Optimal control for a cancer chemotherapy problem with general growth and loss functions. Math. Biosci. 98, 273-287.
14. Murray, J. M. 1990b. Some optimal control problems in cancer chemotherapy with a toxicity limit. Math. Biosci. 100, 49-67.
15. Murray, J. M. 1995. An example of the effects of drug resistance on the optimal schedule for a single drug in cancer chemotherapy. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 12, 55-71.
16. Skipper, H. E. 1983. The forty year old mutation theory of Luria and Delbruck and its pertinence to cancer chemotherapy. Adv. Cancer Research 40, 331-363.
17. gG multiple myeloma. Bull. Math. Biol. 39, 317-337.
18. Swan, G. W. 1987. Tumor growth models and cancer chemotherapy. In Cancer Modeling, J. R. Thompson and B. W. Brown (Eds), pp. 91-179 New York: Marcel Dekker.
19. Swan, G. W. 1990. Role of optimal control theory in cancer chemotherapy. Math. Biosc. 101, 237-284.
20. Vaidya, V. G. and F. J. Alexandro, Jr. 1982. Evaluation of some mathematical models for tumor growth. Int. J. Bio-Med. Comp. 13, 19-35.
21. Vendite, L. L. 1988. Modelagem matemática para o crescimento tumoral e o problema de resistência celular aos fármacos anti-blásticos. Ph.D. thesis, Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brazil.
22. Zietz, S. and C. Nicolini. 1979. Mathematical approaches to optimization of cancer chemotherapy. Bull. Math. Biol. 41, 305-324.