|
|
Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 264-268
|
|
Was the UK collaborative ECMO trial ethical?
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;
CRITICAL ILLNESS;
EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
METHODOLOGY;
MORTALITY;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN DISEASE;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PATIENT CARE;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PROBABILITY;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RANDOMIZATION;
RESEARCH;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TIME;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNCERTAINTY;
UNITED KINGDOM;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
COERCION;
CONGENITAL, HEREDITARY, AND NEONATAL DISEASES AND ABNORMALITIES;
CRITICAL ILLNESS;
EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
INTERNATIONALITY;
MORTALITY;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PATIENT CARE;
PROBABILITY;
RANDOM ALLOCATION;
RESEARCH;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNCERTAINTY;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0031173639
PISSN: 02695022
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1997.tb00003.x Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (14)
|
|
References (0)
|
