Evaluation of accident scenarios in a Dutch steel works using a hazard and operability study

Safety Science

Volumn 26, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 63-74

  Swuste, Paul ^a   Goossens, Louis ^a   Bakker, Frank ^a   Schrover, Jos ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b SWINDEN TECHNOLOGY CENTRE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS; IRON AND STEEL PLANTS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; STEELMAKING;

DUTCH STEEL WORKS; HAZARD AND OPERABILITY (HAZOP) TECHNIQUE; RELEVANT ACCIDENT SCENARIOS;

ACCIDENTS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FURNACE; IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0031171895     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(96)00023-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ainsworth, L.; Kirwan, B.; Livingston, A.; Mullany, D.; Sheperd, A.; Stammer, R.; Visick, D.; Waters, T. and Whalley, S., 1992. Hazard and operability analysis. In: Kirwan, B. and Ainsworth, L. A Guide to Task Analysis. Chapter 5, Task behaviour assessment methods. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London.
2. Bakker, F., 1993. Study on the quality of the HAZOP technique at the "underlength processing installation" and the ladle arc furnace (in Dutch). Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology.
3. CCPS, 1992. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. Centre for Chemical Process Safety. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
4. CIA, 1977. A Guide to Hazard and Operability Studies. Report 1981. Chemical Industries Association Limited, London.
5. Goossens, L., 1991. Risk prevention and policy-making in automatic systems. Risk Analyses 11 (2): 217-228.
6. Groeneweg, J., 1992, Controlling the controllable. PhD thesis, University of Leiden.
7. Harms-Ringdahl, L., (Ed.) 1993. Hazard and operability studies. In: Safety Analysis. Principles and Practice in Occupational Safety, Chapter 7. Elsevier Applied Sciences, London.
8. Illidge, J., 1983. Hazard studies and hazard analysis 10 years on. Loss Prevention Bulletin 05: 1-6.
9. Kirwan, B., 1992. Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1: overview of approaches. Applied Ergonomics 23 (5): 299-318.
10. Kjellen, U., 1984. The role of deviations in accident causation and control. Journal of Occupational Accidents 6 (1-3): 117-126.
11. Kletz, T., 1992. HAZOP and Hazan Identifying and Assessing Process Industry Hazards. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Bristol, USA.
12. Raman, R.; Gargett, A. and Warner, D., 1991. Application of HAZOP techniques for maintenance safety on offshore installations. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, 11-14 November, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 649-656.
13. Schlesselman, P., 1982. Case Control Studies. Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Suokas, J., 1993. Advantages and limitations of safety analysis. In: Soakes, J. and Rouhiainen, V. (Eds). Quality Management of Safety and Risk Analysis, Chapter 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15. Swuste, P., 1990. Workplace analysis and design solutions in the Dutch rubber industry. Journal of Occupational Accidents 13: 111-120.
16. Swuste, P., Kromhout, H. and Drown, D., 1993. Prevention and control of chemical exposures in the rubber manufacturing industry in The Netherlands. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 37 (2): 117-134.