Computing Size Functions from Edge Maps

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 169-183

  Uras, Claudio ^a   Verri, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER VISION; EDGE DETECTION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; FUNCTIONS;

SHAPE RECOGNITION; SIZE FUNCTIONS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 0031165463     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007910913691     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ayache, N. and Faugeras, O.D. 1986. HYPER: A new approach for the recognition and positioning of two-dimensional objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(1):44-54.
2. Forsyth, D.A., Mundy, J.L., Zisserman, A., Coelho, C., Heller, A., and Rothwell, C.A. 1991. Invariant descriptors for 3D object recognition and pose. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(10):971-991.
3. Frosini, P. 1990. A distance for similarity classes of submanifolds of a euclidean space. Bull Austral Math Soc., 42:407-416.
4. Frosini, P. 1991. Measuring shapes by size functions. Proc. of SPIE on Intelligent Robotic Systems, Boston, vol. 1607, pp. 122-133.
5. Frosini, P. 1992. Discrete computation of size functions. Journal of Combinatorics and Information System Science, 17(3-4):232-250.
6. Grimson, W.E.L. and Lozano-Perez, T. 1984. Model-based recognition and localization from sparse range and tactile data. International Journal of Robotics Research, 3(3):3-35.
7. Grimson, W.E.L. and Lozano-Perez, T. 1987. Localizing overlapping parts by searching the interpretation tree. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9(4):469-482.
8. Huttenlocher, D.P. 1989. Three-dimensional recognition of solid objects from a two-dimensional image. A.I. Memo No. 1045, AI Lab, MIT.
9. Huttenlocher, D.P., Klanderman, G.A., and Rucklidge, W.J. 1993. Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(9):850-863.
10. Lowe, D.G. 1987. Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. Artificial Intelligence, 31(3):355-395.
11. Teague, M.R. 1980. Image analysis via the general theory of moments. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 70(8):920-930.
12. Ullman, S. 1987. An approach to object recognition: Aligning pictorial descriptions. A.I. Memo No. 931, AI Lab, MIT.
13. Uras, C. and Verri, A. 1994a. Studying shape through size functions. In Shape in Picture, Y.O., A. Toet, D. Foster, H. Heijmans, and P. Meer (Eds.), NATO ASI Series F, vol. 126, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 81-90.
14. Uras, C. and Verri, A. 1994b. On the recognition of the alphabet of the sign language through size functions. Proc. Intl. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, vol. II, pp. 334-338.
15. Verri, A., Uras, C., Frosini, P., and Ferri, M. 1993. On the use of size functions for shape analysis. Biological Cybernetics, 70(2):99-107.
16. Verri, A. and Uras, C. 1994. Invariant size functions. In Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, and D. Forsyth (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 825, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 215-234.
17. Verri, A. and Uras, C. 1996. A metric-topological approach to shape representation and recognition (submitted to Image and Vision Computing, 14:189-207).