Intersector technology cooperation: Hard myths, soft facts

Technovation

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 309-320

  Geisler, Eliezer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

INTERSECTOR TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION;

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

EID: 0031163304     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(96)00117-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bidault, F. and Cummings, T. (1994) Innovating through alliances: expectations and limitations. R&D Management 24, 38-45.
2. Bleeke, J. and Ernst, D. (Eds.) (1993) Collaborate to Compete: Using Strategic Alliances and Acquisitions in a Global Marketplace. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
3. Bleeke, J. and Ernst, D. (1991) The way to win in cross-border alliances. Harvard Business Review 69 (November-December), 127-135.
4. Bloch, E. (1985) Speech to directors of Industry-University-Cooperative Research Centers, Washington, DC, January.
5. Bloedon, R. and Stokes, D. (1994) Making university/industry collaborative research succeed. Research-Technology Management (March-April), 44-48.
6. Bozeman, B. (1994) Evaluating government technology transfer: early impacts of the cooperative technology paradigm. Policy Studies Journal 22, 322-340.
7. Bozeman, B. and Crow, M. (1991) Technology transfer from US government and university R&D laboratories. Technovation 11, 231-246.
8. Bozeman, B., Papadakis, M. and Coker, K. (1995) Industry perspectives on commercial interactions with federal R&D laboratories. Report to the National Science Foundation, Georgia Tech, January.
9. Carey, J. (1989) The technological base: can cooperation put the US back on top? Business Week (Special Issue on Innovation in America), 38-41.
10. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government (1993) Science, technology, and government for a changing world. Carnegie Commission Report, New York.
11. Drucker, P. (1979) Science and industry: challenges of antagonistic interdependence. Science (25 May), 1110-1116.
12. Eveland, J.D. (1985) Communication Networks in University-Industry Cooperative Research Centers. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
13. Galvin, R. (1995) Forging a world-class future for the national laboratories. Issues in Science and Technology (Fall), 67-72.
14. Geisler, E. (1994) Key output indicators in performance evaluation of research and development organizations. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 27, 189-204.
15. Geisler, E. (1995a) Benchmarking interorganizational R&D/technology cooperation: the link between infrastructure and sustained performance. Paper presented at the Special Academy of Management Conference on The Organization Dimensions of Global Change: No Limits to Cooperation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 3-6 May 1995.
16. Geisler, E. (1995b) When whales are cast ashore: the conversion to relevancy of American universities and basic science. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42, 3-8.
17. Geisler, E. (1995c) An integrated cost-performance model of research and development evaluation. Omega 23, 281-294.
18. Geisler, E. and Clements, C. (1995) Commercialization of technology from federal laboratories: the effects of barriers, incentives and the role of internal entrepreneurship. Report to the National Science Foundation, GRANT NO. 94-01432, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater.
19. Geisler, E. and Rubenstein, A. (1989) University- industry relations: a review of major issues. In: Link, A. and Tassey, E. (Eds.), Cooperative Research: New Strategies for Competitiveness. St Martin's Press, Paris, pp. 43-62.
20. Geisler, E., Furino, A. and Kiresuk, T. (1990) Factors in the success or failure of industry-university cooperative research centers. Interfaces 20, 99-109.
21. Gibson, D. and Harlan, G. (1995) Interorganizational technology transfer. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Maui.
22. Gibson, D. and Rogers, E. (1994) R&D Collaboration on Trial. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
23. Gibson, D., Kehoe, C. and Lee, S. (1994) Collaborative research as a function of proximity, industry and company: a case study of R&D consortia. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41, 255-263.
24. Gray, D., Johnson, E. and Gidley, T. (1986) Industry-university projects and centers: an empirical comparison of two federally funded models of cooperative science. Evaluation Review 10, 776-793.
25. Hagedoorn, J. (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14, 371-386.
26. Hanster, J., Hohn, H.W. and Lutz, S. (1994) Contingencies of innovative networks: a case study of successful interfirm R&D collaboration. Research Policy 23, 47-66.
27. Hesselberth, J. (1991) Consortia: making them work. ChemTech (12 May), 271-273.
28. Hicks, D. (1993) University-industry research links in Japan. Policy Sciences 26, 361-395.
29. Industrial Research Institute (1994) Position Statement, October.
30. Ishihara, S. (1991) The Japan that can say No, translated by Frank Baldwin. Simon & Schuster, New York.
31. Johnson, S.B. (1984) Comparing R&D strategies of Japanese and US firms. Sloan Management Review 25 (Spring), 25-33.
32. Jorde, T.M. and Teece, D. (1989) Competition and cooperation: striking the right balance. California Management Review 31, 25-37.
33. Katz, M. and Ordover, J. (1990) R&D cooperation and competition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 132-203.
34. Lei, D. and Slocum, J.W. Jr. (1991) Global strategic alliances: payoffs and pitfalls. Organizational Dynamics 19, 44-62.
35. Lodge, G. and Walton, R. (1989) The American corporation and its new relationships. California Management Review 31 (Spring), 12.
36. McDonald, D.W. and Gieser, S.M. (1985) Making cooperative research relationships work. Research Management 30, 38-42.
37. McHenry, K.W. (1990) Five myths of industry-university cooperative research - and the realities. Research/Technology Management (May-June), 40-42.
38. Mansfield, E. (1991) Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20, 1-12.
39. Marazita, C. (1991) Technology transfer in the United States industrial research at engineering research centers versus the technological needs of US industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 39, 397-410.
40. Miles, R. and Snow, R. (1992) Causes of failure in network organizations. California Management Review 34 (Summer), 53-72.
41. Narin, F. and Frame, I.D. (1989) The growth of Japanese science and technology. Science 2451, 600-605.
42. National Research Council (1989) The working environment for research in the US and Japanese universities: contracts and commonalities. Office of Japan Affairs, Washington, DC.
43. National Science Foundation (1982) University-Industry Research Relationships: Myths, Realities and Potentials. National Science Board, Washington, DC.
44. OECD (1988) Ministers talk about science and technology for economic growth and social development. Paris, pp. 29-30.
45. Papadakis, M. (1994) Did (or does) the United States have a competitiveness crisis? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13, 1-20.
46. Pitelis, C. (1991) Market failure and the existence of the state: a restatement and critique. International Review of Applied Economics 5, 325-340.
47. Radosevich, R. and Kassicieh, S. (1993) Strategic challenges and proposed responses to competitiveness through public-sector technology. California Management Review 35 (Summer), 33-50.
48. Roessner, D. and Bean, A. (1994) Patterns of industry interaction with federal laboratories. Journal of Technology Transfer 19(B-4), 59-77.
49. Rubenstein, A.H. and Geisler, E. (1994) Relations between university-industry interaction and industrial innovation. Report to the National Science Foundation, Center for Information and Telecommunication Technology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, pp. 5-11.
50. Smith, K., Carroll, S. and Ashford, S. (1995) Intra and interorganizational cooperation: towards a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal 38, 7-23.
51. Spencer, W.J. (1990) Research to product: a major US challenge. California Management Review 32, 45-53.
52. Technology Transfer Society (1994) Technology Transfer Toolkit: A Catalogue of Tools, Methods, and Procedures, 2nd Edn. Indianapolis, IN.
53. Teich, A. and Pace, J. (1985) A survey of interdisciplinary applied research in the US federal government. In: Mar, B., Newell, T. and Saxberg, B. (Eds.), Managing High Technology, Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 113-128.
54. US Congress (1986) Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, P.L. 96-480 (21 October 1980) and Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, P.L. 99-502 (20 October 1986).
55. US Congress (1989) Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (1988), P.L. 100-418 (23 August 1988), and National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act (1989), P.L. 101-189 (29 November 1989).
56. Webster (1977) Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. G&C Merriam, Springfield, MA.
57. Werner, J. and Bremer, J. (1991) Hard lessons in cooperative research. Issues in Science and Technology 7 (Spring), 44-49.