Condensed phase electron-energy-loss spectroscopy of the low-lying triplet states of acetylene

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 106, Issue 23, 1997, Pages 9403-9410

  Swiderek, P ^a   Michaud, M ^b   Sanche, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; BAND STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS;

LOW LYING TRIPLET STATES; POTENTIAL ENERGY SURFACE; STRETCHING VIBRATIONAL MODE;

ACETYLENE;

EID: 0031161830     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.473845     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. H. Lischka and A. Karpfen, Chem. Phys. 102, 77 (1986).
2. M. Peric, S. D. Peyerimhoff, and R. J. Buenker, Mol. Phys. 62, 1339 (1987).
3. R. M. Wetmore and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 1648 (1978).
4. Y. Yamaguchi, G. Vacek, and H. F. Schaefer III, Theor. Chim. Acta 86, 97 (1993).
5. M. R. Robin, Higher Excited States of Polyatomic Molecules (Academic Press New York, 1975), Vol. II, p. 115.
6. D. G. Wilden, P. J. Hicks, and J. Comer, J. Phys. B 10, L403 (1977).
7. P. Hammond, J. Jureta, D. Cvejanovic, G. C. King, and F. H. Read, J. Phys. B 20, 3547 (1987).
8. R. Dressler and M. Allan, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 4510 (1987).
9. H. R. Wendt, H. Hippler, and H. E. Hunziker, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 4044 (1979).
10. E. N. Lassettre, A. Skerbele, M. A. Dillon, and K. J. Ross, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 5066 (1968).
11. L. Sanche and M. Michaud, Phys. Rev. B 30, 6078 (1984).
12. M. Michaud and L. Sanche, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4672 (1987).
13. M. Michaud and L. Sanche, J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. 17, 274 (1980).
14. W.-H. Hung and S. L. Bernasek, Surf. Sci. 339, 272 (1995).
15. P. D. Foo and K. K. Innes, Chem. Phys. Lett. 22, 439 (1973).
16. C. K. Ingold and G. W. King, J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2708.
17. Recent ab initio investigations have been concerned with a more accurate description of specific points on the triplet potential energy surfaces. Their results do not alter the general picture. See the following papers: (a) C. D. Sherill, G. Vacek, Y. Yamaguchi, H. F. Schaefer III, J. F. Stanton, and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 8507 (1996); (b) G. Vacek, C. D. Sherill, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. F. Schaefer III, ibid. 104, 1774 (1996).
18. Recent ab initio investigations have been concerned with a more accurate description of specific points on the triplet potential energy surfaces. Their results do not alter the general picture. See the following papers: (a) C. D. Sherill, G. Vacek, Y. Yamaguchi, H. F. Schaefer III, J. F. Stanton, and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 8507 (1996); (b) G. Vacek, C. D. Sherill, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. F. Schaefer III, ibid. 104, 1774 (1996).
19. P. Swiderek, M. Michaud, and L. Sanche, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 6724 (1996).
20. J. K. G. Watson, M. Herman, J. C. Van Craen, and R. Colin, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 95, 101 (1982).
21. C. K. Ingold and G. W. King, Nature 169, 1101 (1952); J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2702.
22. C. K. Ingold and G. W. King, Nature 169, 1101 (1952); J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2702.
23. K. K. Innes, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 863 (1954).
24. R. H. Huebner, R. J. Celotta, S. R. Mielczarek, and C. E. Kuyatt, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 5434 (1973).
25. K. N. Walzl, C. F. Koerting, and A. Kuppermann, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3796 (1987).