Using distance matrices to choose between competing theories and an application to the origin of modern humans

Journal of Human Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 501-522

  Sokal, Robert R ^a   Oden, Neal L ^b   Walker, Jeff ^c   Waddle, Diane M ^d  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMMES CORPORATION   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Cranial data; Mantel tests; Regional continuity; Single African origin; Three matrix methods

Indexed keywords

CRANIA; HOMINIDAE; PRIMATES;

CRANIAL MORPHOLOGY; EVOLUTION; HOMINID;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION; GENE FREQUENCY; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; TIME;

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION; GENE FREQUENCY; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; TIME;

EID: 0031160919     PISSN: 00472484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1996.0126     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Gheverud, J. M. & Moore, A. J. (1990). Subspecific morphological variation in the saddleback tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis). Am. J. Primatol. 21, 1-55.
2. Costanzo, G. M., Hubert, L. J. & Golledge, G. (1983). A higher moment for spatial statistics. Geog. Anal. 15, 347-351.
3. Dow, M. M. & Gheverud, J. M. (1985). Comparison of distance matrices in studies of population structure and genetic microdifferentiation: quadratic assignment. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 68, 367-373.
4. Gimbutas, M. (1973). Old Europe c. 7000-3500 B.C. J. Indo-Eur. Studies 1, 1-20.
5. Gimbutas, M. (1979). The three waves of Kurgan people into Old Europe, 4500-2500 B.C. Arch. Suisses Anthropol. Gen. 43, 113-137.
6. Gimbutas, M. (1986). Remarks on the ethnogenesis of the Indo-Europeans in Europe. In (W. Bernhard & A. Kandler-Pålsson, Eds) Ethnogenese Europäischer Völker, pp. 5-20. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
7. Hubert, L. J. (1983). Inference procedures for the evaluation and comparison of proximity matrices. In (J. Felsenstein, Ed.) Numerical Taxonomy. Nato ASI Series, Vol. Gl, pp. 209-228. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Konigsberg, L. W., Kramer, A., Donnelly, S. M., Relethford, J. H. & Blangero, J. (1994). Modern human origins. Nature 372, 228-229.
9. Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27, 209-220.
10. Mielke, P. W. (1978). Clarification and appropriate inferences for Mantel and Valand's nonparametric multivariate analysis technique. Biometrics 34, 277-282.
11. Mielke, P. W. (1979). On asymptotic non-normality of null distributions of MRPP statistics. Commun. Statist.-Theor. Meth. Ser. A 8, 1541-1550.
12. Mielke, P. W., Berry, K. J. &Johnson, E. S. (1976). Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Commun. Statist.-Theor. Meth. Ser. A 5, 1409-1424.
13. Oden, N. L. (1992). Spatial autocorrelation invalidates the Dow-Cheverud test. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 89, 257-264.
14. Oden, N. L. & Sokal, R. R. (1992). An investigation of three-matrix permutation tests. J. Classif. 9, 275-290.
15. Prevosti, A., Ocana, J. & Alonso, G. (1975). Distances between populations of Drosophila subobscura based on chromosome arrangement frequencies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 45, 231-241.
16. Relethford, J. H. (1988). Effects of English admixture and geographic distribution on anthropometric variation and genetic structure in 19th century Ireland. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 76, 111-124.
17. Renfrew, C. (1987). Archaeology and Language. London: Jonathan Cape.
18. Slatkin, M. & Arter, H. E. (1991). Spatial autocorrelation methods in population genetics. Am. Nat. 138, 499-517.
19. Smouse, P. E. & Long, J. C. (1992). Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 35, 187-213.
20. Smouse, P. E., Long, J. C. & Sokal, R. R. (1986). Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35, 627-632.
21. Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman
22. Sokal, R. R. (1979). Testing statistical significance of geographic variation patterns. Syst. Zpol. 28, 227-231.
23. Sokal, R. R., Oden, N. L. & Thomson, B. A. (1997). A simulation study of microevolutionary inferences by spatial autocorrelation analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60, 73-93.
24. Sokal, R. R., Oden, N. L., Thomson, B. A. & Kim, J. (1993). Testing for regional differences in means: distinguishing inherent from spurious spatial autocorrelation by restricted randomization. Geogr. Anal. 25, 199-210.
25. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry. 3rd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman.
26. Stringer, C. B. (1993). New views on modern human origins. In (D. J. Rasmussen, Ed.) The Origin and Evolution of Humans and Humanness, pp. 75-93. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
27. Stringer, C. B. & Andrews, P. (1988a). Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans. Science 239, 1263-1264.
28. Stringer, C. B. & Andrews, P. (1988e). Response to Wolpoff et al., 1988. Science 241, 773-774.
29. Waddle, D. (1993). The evolution of modern Homo sapiens: testing models of modern human origins using matrix correlation methods. Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York, Stony Brook.
30. Waddle, D. (1994a). Matrix correlation tests support a single origin for modern humans. Nature 368, 452-455.
31. Waddle, D. (1994b). Reply to modern human origins by Konigsberg et al. Nature 372, 229.
32. Wolfe, D. A. (1976). On testing equality of related correlation coefficients. Biometrika 63, 214-215.
33. Wolfe, D. A. (1977). A distribution-free test for related correlations. Technometrics 19, 507-509.
34. Wolpoff, M. H. (1989). Multiregional evolution: the fossil alternative to Eden. In (P. Mellars & C. B. Stringer, Eds) The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, pp. 62-108. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Wolpoff, M. H. (1991). Theories of modern human origins. In (G. Bräuer & F. Smith, Eds) Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, pp. 25-63. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.