Successive Approximations to an Adequate Model of Attention

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 413-428

  Van Der Heijden, A H C ^a   Bem, S ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; VISION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031160049     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0284     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allport D. A. Attention and performance. Cognitive psychology, new directions. 1980;Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
2. Allport D. A. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. Heuer H., Sanders A. F. Perspectives on perception and action. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
3. Allport D. A. Visual attention. Posner M. I. Foundations of cognitive science. 1989;MIT Press, Cambridge.
4. Anstis S. M. A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research. 14:1974;589-592.
5. Broadbent D. E. Listening to one of two synchronous messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 44:1952;51-55.
6. Broadbent D. E. Perception and communication. 1958;Pergamon, London.
7. Broadbent D. E. Decision and stress. 1971;Academic Press, London.
8. Broadbent D. E. Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica. 50:1982;253-290.
9. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review. 97:1990;523-547.
10. Cave K. R., Wolfe J. M. Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology. 22:1990;225-271.
11. Cherry E. C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 25:1953;957-979.
12. Clark A. Microcognition, philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. 1989;MIT Press, Cambridge.
13. Coren S., Ward L. M., Enns J. T. Sensation and perception. 1994;Harcourt Brace & Co. Fort Worth.
14. Duncan J. Directing attention in the visual field. Perception and Psychophysics. 30:1981;90-93.
15. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 113:1984;501-517.
16. Duncan J. Coordinated brain systems in selective perception and action. Inni T., McClelland J. L. Attention and performance XVI. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge.
17. Eriksen C. W. Attentional search of the visual field. Brogan D. Visual search. 1990;Taylor and Francis, London.
18. Eriksen C. W. The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition. 2:1995;101-118.
19. Eriksen C. W., Hoffman J. E. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics. 14:1973;155-160.
20. Eriksen C. W., Rohrbauch J. W. Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention. American Journal of Psychology. 83:1970;330-343.
21. Eriksen C. W., St. James J. D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics. 40:1986;225-240.
22. Eriksen C. W., Yeh Y. Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 5:1985;583-597.
23. Flanagan O. The science of the mind. 1991;MIT Press, Cambridge.
24. Folk C. L., Egeth H. Does the identification of simple features require serial processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;97-110.
25. Gould S., Lewontin R. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B. 205:1979;581-598.
26. James W. The principles of psychology. 1890/1950;Dover, New York.
27. Jonides J. Further toward a model of the mind's eye's movements. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 21:1983;247-250.
28. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. 1973;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
29. Kahneman D., Chajczyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 9:1983;497-509.
30. Kahneman D., Henik A. Effects of visual grouping on immediate recall and selective attention. Dornic S. Attention and performance VII. 1977;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
31. Kahneman D., Henik A. Perceptual organization and attention. Kubovy M., Pomerantz J. R. Perceptual organization. 1981;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
32. Kahneman D., Treisman A. Changing views of attention and automaticity. Parasuraman R., Davies P. R. Varieties of attention. 1984;Academic Press, New York.
33. La Berge D., Brown V. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review. 96:1989;101-124.
34. Merikle P. M. Selection from visual persistence by perceptual groups and category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 109:1980;279-295.
35. Miller G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. 63:1956;81-97.
36. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. 1967;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
37. Neisser U. Cognition and reality. 1976;Freeman, San Francisco.
38. Neumann O. Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. Heuer H., Sanders A. F. Perspectives on perception and action. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
39. Neumann O. Konzepte der Aufmerksamkeit. 1991;Bielefeld University.
40. Neumann O., Van der Heijden A. H. C., Allport D. A. Visual selective attention: Introductory remarks. Psychological Research. 48:1986;185-188.
41. Phaf R. H., Van der Heijden A. H. C., Hudson P. T. W. SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology. 22:1990;273-341.
42. Posner M. I. Orienting of attention. The VIIth Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:1980;3-25.
43. Posner M. I., Snyder C. R. R., Davidson B. J. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 109:1980;160-174.
44. Remington R., Pierce L. Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception and Psychophysics. 35:1984;393-399.
45. Schneider W. X. VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition. 2:1995;331-376.
46. Theeuwes J. Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis. Acta Psychologica. 53:1993;93-154.
47. Treisman A. M. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 40:1988;201-237.
48. Treisman A. M. Variations on the theme of feature integration: Reply to Navon (1990). Psychological Review. 97:1990;460-463.
49. Treisman A. M. Modularity and attention: Is the binding problem real? Visual Cognition. 2:1995;303-311.
50. Treisman A. M., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
51. Treisman A. M., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review. 95:1988;15-48.
52. Treisman A. M., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;459-478.
53. Tsostos J. K. Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 13:1990;423-445.
54. Van der Heijden A. H. C. Selective attention in vision. 1992;Routledge, London/New York.
55. Van der Heijden A. H. C. The role of position in object selection in vision. Psychological Research. 56:1993;44-58.
56. Van der Heijden A. H. C. Modularity and attention. Visual Cognition. 2:1995;269-302.
57. Van der Heijden A. H. C. Two stages in visual information processing and visual perception? Visual Cognition. 3:1996;325-361.
58. Van der Heijden A. H. C., Kurvink A. G., De Lange L., De Leeuw F., Van der Geest J. N. Attending to color with proper fixation. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;1224-1237.
59. Wolfe J. M. Extending guided search: Why guided search needs a preattentive "item map." Kramer A., Logan G., Coles M. Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. 1995;Am. Psychol. Assoc. Washington.
60. Wolfe J. M., Cave K. R., Franzel S. L. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;419-433.