|
Volumn 82, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 20-23
|
Beyond the credentialing and privileging controversy surrounding image-guided breast biopsy. The rationale for a national registry for quantifying outcomes.
a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACCREDITATION;
ARTICLE;
BREAST;
BREAST TUMOR;
ECHOGRAPHY;
ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT;
HUMAN;
METHODOLOGY;
NEEDLE BIOPSY;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PATHOLOGY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
BIOPSY, NEEDLE;
BREAST;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CREDENTIALING;
EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL;
GUIDELINES;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL STAFF PRIVILEGES;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0031160044
PISSN: 00028045
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (0)
|