A marketing perspective of the U.S. International Trade Commission's antidumping actions - An empirical inquiry

Journal of World Business

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 169-187

  Czinkota, Michael R ^a   Kotabe, Masaaki ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Masaaki Kotabe   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031158779     PISSN: 10909516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1090-9516(97)90006-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baldwin R.E. The political economy of protectionism. The Political Economy of U.S. Import Policy. 1985;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Baron D.P. Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review. 37:(1):1995;47-65.
3. Capon N., Glazer R. Marketing and technology: a strategic coalignment. Journal of Marketing. 51:(7):1987;1-14.
4. Cumby R.E., Moran T.H. Testing models of the trade policy process: The case of anti-dumping in the Uruguay Round. 1994a;Georgetown University School of Foreign Service. Fall.
5. Cumby R.E., Moran T.H. Antidumping as a current policy issue. World Business Policy Brief. 1994b;Georgetown University Center for International Business Education and Research. December.
6. Czinkota M.R., Ronkainen I. International Marketing. 4th ed. 1995;309 Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX.
7. Czinkota M.R., Kotabe M. America's new world trade order. Marketing Management. 1:(3):1992;49-56.
8. Dussauge P., Hart S., Ramanantsoa B. Strategic Technology Management. 1992;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. December 17 A borderline case. Economist. 1994;73.
10. Ela J.D., Irwin M.R. Technology changes market boundaries. Industrial Marketing Management. 12:(7):1983;153-156.
11. Etzioni A. The political economy of imperfect competition. Journal of Public Policy. 5:(2):1985;169-186.
12. Finger M.J. Antidumping: How it works and who gets hurt. 1993;University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
13. Finger M.J., Hall H.K., Nelson D.R. The political economy of administered protection. American Economic Review. 72:(3):1982;452-466.
14. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1947;GATT, Geneva.
15. Griffith S.S., Phipps R.P. Honey talks yield sweet results: Import duties on Chinese honey. China Business Review. 23:(1):1996;48-52.
16. Herander M.G., Pupp R.L. Firm participation in steel industry lobbying. Economic Inquiry. 29:(1):1991;134-147.
17. Hindley B. Dumping and the Far East trade of the European Community. The World Economy. 11:(12):1988;445-463.
18. Hirsch S. Anti-dumping actions in Brussels and East-West trade. The World Economy. 11:(12):1988;465-484.
19. Hunt S.D. Marketing theory: The philosophy of marketing science. 1983;Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
20. Kodama F. Technology fusion and the new R&D. Harvard Business Review. 70:1992;70-78. (July-August).
21. Kreinin M.E. International economics: A policy approach. 5th ed. 1987;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, FL.
22. Lytle D. Keeping the playing field level: United States International Trade Commission rules in favor of Wyatt Technology in unfair pricing dispute with Otsuka. Photonics Spectra. 1990;. October, 18.
23. Matsumoto H. Legal harassment of foreign firms: The case of the U.S. steel industry. Pacific Basin Quarterly. 1993;. (Fall).
24. Norall C. New trends in anti-dumping practice in Brussels. The World Economy. 9:(3):1986;97-111.
25. Rehbein K., Lenway S. Industry signals and political success: An analysis of the U.S. International Trade Commission's escape clause investigations. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Academy of International Business. 1993.
26. Ritt A., Berry B. Leave the lawyers at home. Let's talk. New Steel. 4:1994;20-25.
27. Rugman A.M., Anderson A. Administered protection in America. 1987;Croom Helm, New York.
28. Salorio E. Strategic use of import protection: Seeking shelter for competitive advantage. Rugman A., Verbeke A. Research in global strategic management. 1993;103-124 JAI, Greenwich, CT.
29. Schott J. The Uruguay Round: An assessment. 1994;Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C.
30. Sykes A.O. GATT safeguards reform: The injury test. Trebilcock M., York R. Fair exchange: Reforming trade remedy laws. 1990;203-230 C.D. Howe Institute, Toronto.
31. U.S. General Accounting Office. International trade: Use of the GATT antidumping code. 1990a;. Washington D.C.: GAO/NSIAD-90-238 FS, July.
32. U.S. General Accounting Office. International Trade: Comparison of U.S. and foreign antidumping practices. 1990b;. Washington D.C.: GAO/NSIAD-91-59, November.
33. U.S. International Trade Commission. Collection of trade assistance cases. 1980-1992;U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
34. U.S. International Trade Commission. Proceedings before the U.S. international trade commission. Meeting of the commission, June 12. 1985.
35. U.S. International Trade Commission. The year in trade: 1993 operations of the trade agreements program. Washington D.C. U.S. ITC Publication 2769. 1994;. June.
36. U.S. International Trade Commission. The economic effects of antidumping and countervailing duty orders and suspension agreements. 1995;2-15 Publication 2900, U.S. Government Printing Office.
37. Vernon R. Ascendancy of the private sector in developing countries: Trend or pendulum? 1992;International Finance Corporation, Washington D.C. December 10.
38. White A.P. The dominant firm: A study of market power. 1983;UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor, MI.