Reduced risk of complex response: An invisible outcome

Nursing Administration Quarterly

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 25-31

  Harris, Marcelline R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced practice; Outcomes; Risk

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; NURSE; NURSE PRACTITIONER; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0031158580     PISSN: 03639568     EISSN: 15505103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00006216-199702140-00006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Nurses Association, Scope and Standards of Advanced Practice Registered Nursing (Washington, DC: ANA, 1996).
2. T. Porter-O'Grady, Reorganization of Nursing Practice: Creating the Corporate Venture (Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, 1990).
3. K.C. Kelly, et al., “The Medical Outcomes Study: A Nursing Perspective,” Journal of Professional Nursing 10, no. 4 (1994): 209-216.
4. M.G. Morgan, “Risk Analysis and Management,” Scientific American (July 1993): 32-41.
5. N. Bergstrom, et al., “The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk,” Nursing Research 36, no. 4 (1987): 205-10.
6. Panel for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Adults, in Pressure Ulcers in Adults: Prediction and Prevention. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 3, AHCPR Publication No. 92-0047, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1992).
7. K. Zander, “Nursing Case Management: Strategic Management of Cost and Quality Outcomes,” Journal of Nursing Administration 18, no. 5 (1988), 23-30.
8. K.A. Bower, Case Management by Nurses (Kansas City, MO: American Nurses Publishing, 1992).
9. P. Ethridge and G.S. Lamb, “Professional Nursing Case Management Improves Quality, Access and Costs,” Nursing Management 20, no. 3 (1989): 30-35.
10. B.J. Stewart and P.G. Archbold, “Nursing Intervention Studies Require Outcome Measures That Are Sensitive to Change,” Part 2, Research in Nursing and Health 16 (1993): 77-81.
11. B.J. Stewart and P.G. Archbold, “Nursing Intervention Studies Require Outcome Measures That Are Sensitive to Change,” Part 1, Research in Nursing and Health 15 (1992): 477-481.
12. "A Fistful of Risks.” Discover 17, no. 5 (May 1996): 82-83.
13. I. Hertz-Piccioto, “Epidemiology and Quantitative Risk Assessment: A Bridge from Science to Policy,” American Journal of Public Health 85, no. 4 (1995): 484-493.
14. R.E. Shore, “Epidemiologic Data in Risk Assessment, Imperfect But Valuable,” editorial, American Journal of Public Health 85, no. 4 (1995): 474-475.
15. D.E. Lilienfeld and P.D. Stolley, Foundations of Epidemiology, 3d ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
16. G.R. Iversen, Bayesian Statistical Inference (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1984).
17. National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983).
18. S.L. Ferketich and J.A. Verran, “Analysis Issues in Outcomes Research,” in Proceedings of the State of the Science Conference, National Center for Nursing Research, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service and the National Institutes of Health, September 11-13, 1991, NIH Publication No. 93-341 1 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1992), 174-88.
19. L.M. Harpster and M. Veach, Risk Management Handbook for Health Care Facilities (Chicago: American Hospital Publishing, 1990).
20. K.A. McCormick, “Future Data Needs for Quality of Care Monitoring, DRG Considerations, Reimbursement, and Outcome Measurement,” Image 23, no. 1 (1992): 29-32.