Malpractice issues in radiology alteration of medical records

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 168, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1405-1408

  Berlin, Leonard ^a,b  

^a RUSH NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE;

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE MEGLUMINE; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; RISK MANAGEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031156168     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168697     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Arato vAvedon, 858 P2d 598 (Calif 1993)
2. Berlin L. Reporting the "missed" radiologie diag-nosis: medicolegal and ethical considerations. Radiology 1994; 192:183-187
3. Sutlire v Hackney, 297 SE2d 515 (Ga App 1983)
4. KeilMey v St. Joseph's Hospital, 698 P2d 435 (NMex App 1984)
5. Malier v Thaiit, 430 NW2d 884 (Nebr 1988)
6. /n Re Jascalevich, 442 A2d 635 (NJ App 1982)
7. Rice B. "Doctoring" a chart cost this M.D. SI million. MedEcon May 13,1996;78-92
8. LeBlang TR, King JL. Tort liability for nondisclosure: the physician's legal obligations to disclose patient illness and injury. Dickinson Law fovieivl984;89:l-52