A Survey of Homeobox Genes inChaetopterus variopedatusand Analysis of Polychaete Homeodomains

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 331-345

  Irvine, Steven Q ^a   Warinner, Sonja A ^a,b   Hunter, John D ^a   Martindale, Mark Q ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABD B PROTEINS, DROSOPHILA; ABD-B PROTEINS, DROSOPHILA; DFD PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; EYE PROTEIN; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; HOX 2.7 PROTEIN, XENOPUS; INSECT PROTEIN; NERVE CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; ROUGHEST PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; XENOPUS PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; HOMEOBOX; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYCHAETA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; XENOPUS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES, NEURONAL; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EYE PROTEINS; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; INSECT PROTEINS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POLYCHAETA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; XENOPUS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 0031154454     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0407     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. J. Adachi, M. Hasegawa, 1994, PROTML, Version 2.2, Maximum Likelihood Inference of Protein Phylogeny.
2. Aisemberg G. O., Wysocki-Diller J., Wong V. Y., Macagno E. R. Antennapedia-class homeobox genes define diverse neuronal sets in the embryonic CNS of the leech. J. Neurobiol. 24:1993;1423-1432.
3. Aisemberg G. O., Macagno E. R. Lox1,Antennapedia. Dev. Biol. 161:1994;455-465.
4. Akam M. Hox. Cell. 57:1989;347-349.
5. Akam M., Averof M., Castelli-Gair J., Dawes R., Falciani F., Ferrier D. The evolving role of Hox genes in arthropods. Development. 1994:1994;209-215.
6. Akam M. Hox genes and the evolution of diverse body plans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 349:1995;313-319.
7. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:1990;403-410.
8. Averof M., Akam M. Hox. Nature. 376:1995;420-423.
9. Balavoine G., Telford M. J. Identification of planarian homeobox sequences indicates the antiquity of most Hox/homeotic gene subclasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;7227-7231.
10. Ballard J. W. O., Olsen G. J., Faith D. P., Odgers W. A., Rowell D. M., Atkinson P. W. Evidence from 12S rRNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science. 258:1992;1345-1348.
11. Blake J. A. Phylum Annelida: Class Polychaeta. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. 1975;Univ. California Press, Berkeley. p. 151-243.
12. Blumberg B., Wright C. V. E., De Robertis E. M., Cho K. W. Y. Organizer-specific homeobox genes inXenopus laevis. Science. 253:1991;194-196.
13. Brusca R. C., Brusca G. J. Invertebrates. 1990;Sinauer, Sunderland.
14. Bürglin T. R. A comprehensive classification of homeobox genes. Duboule D. Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes. 1994;27-71 Sambrook & Tooze, Oxford.
15. Conway Morris S. Middle Cambrian polychaetes from the Brugess Shale of British Columbia. Phil Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B. 285:1979;227-274.
16. Conway Morris S. The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature. 361:1993;219-225.
17. Crompton M. R., Bartlett T. J., MacGregor A. D., Manfioletti G., Burati E., Giancotti V., Goodwin G. H. Identification of a novel vertebrate homeobox gene expressed in haematopoietic cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:1992;5661-5667.
18. Dayhoff M. O., Schwartz R. M., Orcutt B. C. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Dayhoff M. O. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. 1978;345-352 National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington.
19. Degnan B. M., Morse D. E. Identification of eight homeobox-containing transcripts expressed during larval development and at metamorphosis in the gastropod molluscHaliotis rufescens. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 2:1993;1-9.
20. Dick M. H., Buss L. W. A PCR-based survey of homeobox genes inCtenodrilus serratus. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 3:1994;146-158.
21. Doyle J. J. Evolution of a plant homeotic multigene family: Toward connecting molecular systematics and molecular developmental genetics. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;307-328.
22. Eernisse D. J., Albert J. S., Anderson F. E. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: A phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst. Biol. 41:1992;305-330.
23. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
24. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:1981;368-376.
25. J. Felsenstein, 1995, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.57c, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
26. Frumkin A., Rangini Z., Ben-Yehuda A., Gruenbaum Y., Fainsod A. A chickencaudalCHox-cad, Development. 112:1991;207-219.
27. Frumkin A., Pillemer G., Haffner R., Tarcic N., Gruenbaum Y., Fainsod A. A role forCdxA. Development. 120:1994;253-263.
28. Glaessner M. F., Wade M. The late Pre-cambrian fossils from Ediacara, South Australia. Paleontology. 9:1966;599-628.
29. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Saitou N. On the maximum likelihood method in molecular phylogenetics. J. Mol. Evol. 32:1991;443-445.
30. Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;10915-10919.
31. Hillis D. M. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;3-16.
32. Holland P. W. H., Hogan B. L. M. Phylogenetic distribution ofAntennapedia. Nature. 321:1986;251-253.
33. Holland P. W. H. Homeobox genes and segmentation: Co-option, co-evolution, and convergence. Semin. Dev. Biol. 1:1990;135-145.
34. Holland P. W. H., Garcia-Fernandez J. Hox. Dev. Biol. 173:1996;382-395.
35. Hromas R., Radich J., Collins S. PCR cloning of an orphan homeobox gene (PRH) preferentially expressed in myeloid and liver cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195:1993;976-983.
36. Irvine S. M., Martindale M. Q. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of segmentation in annelids. Semin. Dev. Biol. 7:1996;593-604.
37. Kishino H., Miyata T., Hasegawa M. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 30:1990;151-160.
38. Lake J. A. Origin of the Metazoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:1990;763-766.
39. Master V. A., Kourakis M., Martindale M. Q. Isolation, characterization, and expression ofLe-msx,msx. Helobdella. Dev. Dyn. 207:1996;404-419.
40. McGuiness N., Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. HumanHox-4.2Deformed. Cell. 63:1990;969-976.
41. Manak J. R., Scott M. P. A class act: Conservation of homeodomain protein functions. Development. 1994:1994;61-71.
42. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
43. Mlodzik M., Gehring W. J. Expression of thecaudal. Cell. 48:1987;465-478.
44. Murtha M. T., Leckman J. F., Ruddle F. H. Detection of homeobox genes in development and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:1991;10711-10715.
45. Nardelli-Haefliger D., Shankland M. Lox2, Development. 116:1992;697-710.
46. Philippe H., Chenuil A., Adoutte A. Can the Cambrian explosion be inferred through molecular phylogeny? Development. 1994:1994;15-25.
47. Ruddle F. H., Bartels J. L., Bentley K. L., Kappen C., Murtha M. T., Pendleton J. W. Evolution ofHox. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28:1994;423-442.
48. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:1987;406-425.
49. Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989;Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
50. Schubert F. R., Nieselt-Struwe K., Gruss P. The Antennapedia-type homeobox genes have evolved from three precursors separated early in metazoan evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;143-147.
51. Shankland M., Martindale M. Q., Nardelli-Haefliger D., Baxter E., Price D. J. Origin of segmental identity in the development of the leech nervous system. Development. 2:1991;29-38.
52. Slack J. M. W., Holland P. W. H., Graham C. F. The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature. 361:1993;490-492.
53. Snow P., Buss L. W. HOM/Hox-type homeoboxes fromStylaria lacustris. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 3:1994;360-364.
54. D. L. Swofford, 1991, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1, Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
55. Tateno Y., Takezaki N., Nei M. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;261-277.
56. Turbeville J. M., Pfeifer D. M., Field K. G., Raff R. A. The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:1991;669-686.
57. Wagner A., Blackstone N., Cartwright P., Dick M., Misof B., Snow P., Wagner G. P., Bartels J., Murtha M., Pendleton J. Surveys of gene families using polymerase chain reaction: PCR selection and PCR drift. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;250-261.
58. Wedeen C. J., Kostriken R. G., Matsumura I., Weisblat D. A. Evidence for a new family of evolutionarily conserved homeobox genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:1990;1908.
59. Willmer P. Invertebrate Relationships: Patterns in Animal Evolution. 1990;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
60. Wong V. Y., Aisemberg G. O., Gan W-B., Macagno E. R. The leech homeobox geneLox4. J. Neurosci. 15:1995;5551-5559.
61. Wright C. V. E., Schnegelsberg P., De Robertis E. M. XlHbox8: A novelXenopus. Development. 105:1988;787-794.
62. Wysocka-Diller J., Aisemberg G. O., Macagno E. R. A novel homeobox cluster expressed in repeated structures of the midgut. Dev. Biol. 171:1995;439-447.
63. Wysocka-Diller J. W., Aisemberg G., Baumgarten M., Levine M., Macagno E. R. Characterization of a homologue of bithorax-complex genes in the leechHirudo medicinalis. Nature. 341:1989;760-763.