Is regularization determined by semantics, or grammar, or both? Comments on Kim, Marcus, Pinker, Hollander & Coppola (1994)

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 495-501

  Shirai, Yasuhiro ^a  

^a Morrill Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0031154389     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000997003140     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bybee, J. L. & Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59, 251-70.
2. Daugherty, K. G., MacDonald, M. C., Petersen, A. S. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1993). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field, but people often say they do. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 383-8. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Harris, C. L. (1992). Understanding English past-tense formation: the shared meaning hypothesis. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 100-5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. _ (1993). Using old words in new ways: the effect of argument structure, form class and affixation. CLS 29 : (Vol. 2) Papers from parasession on the correspondence of conceptual, semantic and grammatical representations, pp. 139-53. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
5. Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A. & Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science 15, 173-218.
6. _ Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. & Coppola, M. (1994). Sensitivity of children's inflection to grammatical structure. Journal of Child Language 21, 173-209. [Reprinted in K. Perrera, G. Collis & B. Richards (eds), Growing points in child language. Cambridge: C.U.P. 1994.]
7. _ Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. & Coppola, M. (1994). Sensitivity of children's inflection to grammatical structure. Journal of Child Language 21, 173-209. [Reprinted in K. Perrera, G. Collis & B. Richards (eds), Growing points in child language. Cambridge: C.U.P. 1994.]
8. Marcus, G. F., Brinkman, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R. & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: the exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29, 189-256.
9. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science 253, 530-5.
10. Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist net. Cognition 48, 21-69.