Prescreening Entire Mammograms for Masses with Artificial Neural Networks: Preliminary Results

Academic Radiology

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 405-414

  Kalman, Barry L ^a   Reinus, William R ^a   Kwasny, Stan C ^a   Laine, Andrew ^a   Kotner, Lawrence ^a  

^a BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast radiography; Computers, neural network

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0031154282     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(97)80046-3     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Miller BA, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, et al. SEER cancer statistics review: 1973-1991. National Institutes of Health publication no. 94-2789. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1994.
2. Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC, et al. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:892-897.
3. Mettlin C, Smart CR. Breast cancer detection guidelines for women aged 40 to 49 years: rationale for the American Cancer Society reaffirmation of recommendations. CA Cancer J Clin 1994;44:248-255.
4. Dodd GD. American Cancer Society guidelines from the past to the present. Cancer 1993;72(suppl 4):1429-1432.
5. Volkers N. NCI replaces guidelines with statement of evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:14-15.
6. Lau TK, Bishof WF. Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. Comput Biomed Res 1991;24:273-295.
7. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Lam KL, Schmidt RA. Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms: methodology and preliminary clinical study. Invest Radiol 1988;23:664-671.
8. Yin FF, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Doi K, Schmidt RA. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol 1993;28:473-481.
9. Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994;191:331-337.
10. Yin FF, Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CT, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Am Assoc Phys Med 1991;18:955-963.
11. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, et al. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms. SPIE 1993;1905:422-432.
12. Brodie I, Gutcheck RA. Radiographic information theory and application to mammography. Med Phys 1982;9:79.
13. Laine A, Schuler S, Fan J. Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:1-28.
14. Laine A. Multiscale wavelet representations for mammographic feature analysis. Presented at the Proceedings of National Cancer Institute Breast Imaging Workshop: State-of-the-Art and New Technologies, Image Enhancement Techniques: Computer Science, Bethesda, MD, September 4-6, 1991.
15. Laine A, Song S. Multiscale wavelet representations for mammographic feature analysis. Presented at the Conference on Mathematical Methods in Medical Imaging, San Diego, CA, July 23-25, 1992.
16. Laine A, Song S. Wavelet processing techniques for digital mammography. Presented at the Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing, Chapel Hill, NC, October 13-16, 1992.
17. Laine A, Schuler S. Hexagonal wavelet processing of digital mammography. Proc SPIE 1993;1989:559-573.
18. Laine A, Schuler S, Fan J. Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:1-28.
19. Wickerhauser MV. Applied wavelet analysis from theory to software. Wellesley, MA: Peters, 1994.
20. Wei D, Chan HP, Helvie MA, et al. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phys 1995;22:1503-1513.
21. Qian W, Kallergi M, Clarke LP, et al. Tree structured wavelet transform segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammography. Med Phys 1995;22:1247-1254.
22. Qian W, Clarke LP, Li HD, Clark R, Silbiger ML. Digital mammography: M-channel quadrature mirror filters (QMFs) for microcalcification extraction. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994;18:301-314.
23. Lucier BJ, Kallergi M, Qian W, et al. Wavelet compression and segmentation of digital mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994;7:27-38.
24. Clarke LP, Kallergi M, Qian W, Li HD, Clark RA, Silbiger ML. Tree-structured nonlinear filter and wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation in digital mammography. Cancer Lett 1994;77:173-181.
25. Golberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR 1994;163:463-468.
26. Wu Y, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 1993;187:81-87.
27. Goldberg V, Manduca A, Ewert DL, Giscoid JJ, Greenleaf JF. Improvement in specificity of ultrasonography tor diagnosis of breast tumors by means of artificial intelligence. Med Phys 1992;19:1475-1481.
28. Wu Y, Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys 1992;19:555-560.
29. Boone JM, Gross GW, Greco-Hunt V, Greenberg B. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II. Introduction and illustration. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1012-1016.
30. Gross GW, Boone JM, Greco-Hunt V, Greenberg B. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II. Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1017-1023.
31. Raff U, Newman FD. Lesion detection in radiologic images using an autoassociative paradigm: preliminary results. Med Phys 1990;17:234-241.
32. Boone JM, Sigillitoi VG, Shaber GS. Neural networks in radiology: an introduction and evaluation in a signal detection task. Med Phys 1990;17:234-241.
33. Reinus WR, Wilson A, Kwasny S, Kalman B. Parallel distributed processing systems as a means of diagnosing solitary lesions of bone. Invest Radiol 1994;29:606-611.
34. Miller AS, Blott BH, Hames TK. Review of neural network applications in medical imaging and signal processing. Med Biol Eng Comp 1992;30:449-464.
35. Parks RW, Long DL, Levine DS, et al. Parallel distributed processing and neural networks: origins, methodology, and cognitive functions. Int J Neurosci 1991;60:195-214.
36. Suckling J, Dance DR, Moskokvic E, Lewis DJ, Blacker SG. Segmentation of mammograms using multiple linked self-organizing neural networks. Med Phys 1995;22:145-152.
37. Chan H, Lo SB, Sahiner B, Lam KL, Helvie MA. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. Med Phys 1995;22:1555-1567.
38. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, et al. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcification from digital mammograms. SPIE 1993;205:422-432.
39. Newman WF, Sproull R. Principles of interactive computer graphics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1979;402-404.
40. Mallat S, Zhang S. Characterization of signals from multiscale adages. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1992;14:710-732.
41. Kwasny SC, Kalman BL. Tail-recursive distributed representations and simple recurrent networks. Connect Sci 1995;7:61-80.
42. Fu L. Neural networks in computer intelligence. St Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
43. Dai X. Wavelet applications in process sensor data analysis. Doctoral dissertation. St Louis, MO: Washington University, 1996.
44. MacKay DJC. Bayesian interpolation. Neural Computation 1992;4:415-447.
45. Abu-Mostafa YS. Machines that learn from hints. Sci Am 1995;272:64-69.
46. Yu Y, Simmons RF. Extra output biased learning. Technical report AI90-128. Austin, TX: University of Texas, March 1990.
47. Minsky ML, Paper SA. Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.
48. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer R. Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.
49. Weiss SM, Kulikowski CA. Computer systems that learn. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.
50. Kalman B, Kwasny SC. High performance training of feed-forward and simple recurrent networks. Neurocomputing 1997;14:63-84.
51. Powell MJD. Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method. Math Programming 1977;12:241-254.
52. Lu P, Giger ML, Schmidt RA, et al. Computer-aided detection of masses on digital mammograms: processing and feature extraction with multiple-gray-level resolution (abstr). Radiology 1993;189(P):186.