Prediction of remaining strength of corroded pressurised pipelines

International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 213-217

  Ahammed, M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SERVICE LIFE; STEEL CORROSION; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

CORRODED PRESSURIZED PIPELINES;

STEEL PIPE;

CORROSION; PIPES-STEEL; STRENGTH PREDICTION;

EID: 0031148465     PISSN: 03080161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00081-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ANSI/ASME (American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers) B31G. Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, 1984.
2. CAN/CSA-Z184-M86, Gas Pipeline Systems. Canadian Standards Association, 1986.
3. Hopkins, P. and Jones, D. G., A study of the behavior of long and complex-shaped corrosion in transmission pipelines. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Volume V, Part A, 1992, pp. 211-217.
4. Kiefner, J. F., Maxey, W. A., Eiber, R. J. and Duffy, A. R., Failure stress levels of flaws in pressurized cylinders. Progress in Flaw Growth and Fracture Toughness Testing. ASTM STP 536, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1973, pp. 461-481.
5. Maxey, W. A., Kiefner, J. F., Eiber, R. J. and Duffy, A. R., Ductile fracture initiation, propagation and arrest in cylindrical vessels. Fracture Toughness, Proceedings of the 1971 National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Part II, ASTM STP 514. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1972, pp. 70-81.
6. Mok, D. R. B., Pick, R. J. and Glover, A. G., Behavior of line pipe with long external corrosion. Materials Performance, 1990, 75-79.
7. Coulson, K. E. W. and Worthington, R. G., Standard damage-assessment approach is overly conservative. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 54-59.
8. Coulson, K. E. W. and Worthington, R. G., New guidelines promise more accurate damage assessment. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 41-44.
9. Kiefner, J. F. and Vieth, P. H., New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 56-59.
10. Kiefner, J. F. and Vieth, P. H., PC program speeds new criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 91-93.
11. O'Grady II, T. J., Hisey, D. T. and Kiefner, J. F., Method for evaluating corroded pipe addresses variety of patterns. Oil and Gas Journal, 77-82.
12. O'Grady II, T. J., Hisey, D. T. and Kiefner, J. F., Pressure calculation for corroded pipe developed. Oil and Gas Journal, 1992, 84-89.
13. Bubenik, T. A., Olson, R. J., Stephens, D. R. and Francis, R. B., Analyzing the pressure strength of corroded line pipe. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Volume V, Part A, 1992, pp. 225-231.
14. Schumacher, M., Seawater Corrosion Handbook. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, NJ, 1979.
15. Melchers, R. E., Marine corrosion of steel specimens -phenomenological modelling. Research Report, Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, The University of Newcastle, Australia, 1995.
16. Southwell, C. R., Bultman, J. D. and Alexander, A. L., Corrosion of metals in tropical environments - Final Report of 16-Year exposures. Materials Performance, 1976, 9-25.