Relevance of science information: Origins and dimensions of relevance and their implications to information retrieval

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 339-352

  Park, Hongseok ^a  

^a NONE   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

RELEVANCE DIMENSIONS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0031147205     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(96)00072-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 149-159.
2. Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 208-216.
3. Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?. Social Studies of Sciences, 5, 423-441.
4. Cooper, W. S. (1971). A definition of relevance for information retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval, 7, 19-37.
5. Cuadra, C. A., & Katter, R. V. (1967). Experimental studies of relevance judgment: Final report. Santamonica, CA: System Development Corporation.
6. Duncan, E. B. et al. (1981). Qualified citation indexing: Its relevance to educational technology. In Duncan, E. B. & McAleese, R. (Eds). Information retrieval in educational technology (pp. 70-79). Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen Press.
7. Finney, B. (1979). The reference characteristics of scientific texts. Masters dissertation, Center for Information Science, City University, London.
8. Gay, L. S., & Croft, W. B. (1990). Interpreting nominal compounds for information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 26, 21-38.
9. Hodges, T. (1978). Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographic control. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
10. Lancaster, F. W. (1986). Vocabulary control for information retrieval. Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press.
11. Leonard, L. E. (1975). Inter-indexer consistency and retrieval effectiveness: Measurement and relationship. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, IL.
12. Liddy, E. D. (1990). Anaphora in natural language processing and information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 26, 39-52.
13. Lipetz, B. A. (1965). Improvement of the selectivity citation indexes to science literature through the inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation, 16(2), 81-90.
14. Markey, K. (1984). Interindexer consistency tests: A literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials. Library and Information Science Research, 6, 155-177.
15. Maron, M. E., & Kuhns, J. L. (1960). On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 7(3), 295-311.
16. Metzler, D. P., Hass, S. W., & Cosic, C. L. (1990). Conjunction, ellipsis, and other discontinuous constituents in the constituent object parser. Information Processing & Management, 26, 53-71.
17. Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
18. Park, H. (1995). Inferential relevance and its implications to inferential information retrieval. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
19. Park, T. K. (1993). The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63(3), 318-351.
20. Salton, G. (1989). Automatic text processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Salton, G., Buckley, C., & Smith, M. (1990). On the application of syntactic methodologies in automatic text analysis. Information Processing & Management, 26, 73-92.
22. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321-343.
23. Schamber, L. (1992). User's criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situation (Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University, NY). Dissertation Abstract International, 52, 4128A
24. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., & Nilan, M. S. (1990). A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing & Management, 26, 755-776.
25. Schutz, A. (1970) Reflection on the problem of relevance. New Haven, NY: Yale University Press.
26. Spigel-Rosing, I. (1977). Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7, 97-113.
27. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
29. Wang, P., & Soergel, D. (1993). Beyond topical relevance: Document selection behavior of real users of IR systems. Proceedings of the 56th ASIS Annual Meeting, 30, 87-92.
30. Wilson, P. (1973). Situational relevance. Information Storage and Retrieval, 9, 457-471.