A simultaneous route-level transit patronage model: Demand, supply, and inter-route relationship

Transportation

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 159-181

  Peng, Zhong Ren ^a,c   Dueker, Kenneth J ^a   Strathman, James ^a   Hopper, Janet ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Tri County Metropolitan Transportation District   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competing routes; Geographic information systems (GIS); Route level modeling; Simultaneous equation models; Transit demand; Transit supply

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

RIDERSHIP; ROUTE LEVEL MODEL; TRANSIT DEMAND; TRANSIT SUPPLY;

TRANSPORTATION;

GIS; MODELLING APPROACH; PLANNING TECHNIQUE; RIDERSHIP CHANGE; TRANSPORT PLANNING; TRANSPORT USE;

EID: 0031146871     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1017951902308     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alperovich G, Kemp MA & Goodman KM (1977) An econometric model of bus transit demand and supply. The Urban Institute Working Paper No. 5032-1-4, Washington, D.C.
2. Cherwony W & Polin L (1977) Forecasting patronage on new transit routes. Traffic Quarterly: 287-195.
3. Gaudry M (1975) An aggregate time-series analysis of urban transit demand: the Montreal case. Transportation Research 9: 249-258.
4. Horowitz AJ (1984) Simplifications for single-route transit ridership forecasting models. Transportation 12: 261-275.
5. Horowitz AJ & Metzger DN (1985) Implementation of service area concepts in single-route ridership forecasting. Transportation Research Record 1037.
6. Judge GG, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Lutkepohl H & Lee TC (1985) The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7. Kyte M, Stoner GJ & Cryer J (1988) A time-series analysis of public transit ridership in Portland, Oregon, 1971-1982. Transportation Research-A 22: 345-59.
8. Menhard HR & Ruprecht GF (1983) Review of route-level ridership prediction techniques. Transportation Research Record 936.
9. Multisystems, Inc. (1982) Route-Level Demand Models: A Review. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, US Department of Transportation, DOT-1-82-6.
10. Peng Z (1994) A Simultaneous Route-level Transit Patronage Model: Demand, Supply, and Inter-route Relationship. Ph.D. dissertation, Portland State University.
11. Peng, Z & Dueker JK (1995) Spatial data integration in route-level transit demand modeling. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 7: 26-37.
12. Peng Z & Dueker JK (1993) Error and accuracy in spatial data allocations. GIS/LIS 1993 Proceedings (pp. 592-602). Minneapolis.
13. Stopher PR (1992) Development of a route level patronage forecasting method. Transportation 19: 201-220.
14. Stopher PR & Mulhall S (1992) Route level patronage forecasting methods: a survey of transit operators. Presented at the 71st Annual Meeting, transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
15. Tri-Met (1989) Tri-Met Service Standards. Portland, Oregon, unpublished.