Two-level document ranking using mutual information in natural language information retrieval

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 289-306

  Kang, Hyun Kyu ^a,b   Choi, Key Sun ^b  

^a Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION USE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; ONLINE SEARCHING; QUERY LANGUAGES;

TWO LEVEL DOCUMENT RANKING METHOD;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0031142889     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(96)00074-X     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allan, J. (1995). Relevance feedback with too much data. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WA.
2. Belkin, N. J., & Croft, W. B. (1987). Retrieval techniques. In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, (pp. 109-145). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
3. Belkin, N. J., Cool, C., Croft, W. B. &, Callan, J. P. (1993). The effect of multiple query representations on information retrieval performance. Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pittsburgh, PA.
4. Buckley, C., & Lewit, A. F. (1985). Optimization of inverted vector searches. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Montreal, Canada.
5. Buckley, C., Salton, G., & Allan, J. (1994). The effect of adding relevance information in a relevance feedback environment. Paper presented at the Seventeenth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin, Ireland.
6. Buckley, C., & Salton, G. (1995). Optimization of relevance feedback weights. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WA.
7. Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22-29.
8. Cooper, W. S. (1988). Getting beyond Boole. Information Processing & Management 24(3), 243-248.
9. Croft, W. B., & Savino, P. (1988). Implementing ranking strategies using text signatures. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(1), 42-62.
10. Fano, R. (1961). Transmission of information: A statistical theory of communications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
11. Haines, D., & Croft, W. B. (1993). Relevance feedback and inference networks. Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pittsburgh, PA.
12. Harman, D., & Candela, G. (1990). Retrieving records from a gigabyte of text on a minicomputer using statistical ranking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(8), 581-589.
13. Harman, D. (1992a). Ranking algorithms. In W.B. Frakes & R. Baeza-Yates (eds.), Information retrieval: Data structure and algorithms (Chap. 14, pp. 363-392). Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
14. Harman, D. (1992b). Relevance feedback revisited. Paper presented at the Fifteenth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark.
15. Kang, H. K., Lee, C. Y., Jang, H. W., & Park, S. Y. (1994). An implementation of an automatic keyword extraction system. Paper presented at the 3rd Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China.
16. Kemong, (1992). The Kemong Company new encyclopedia. Seoul: Kemongsa Publishing Co.
17. Lee, J. H. (1995). Combining multiple evidence from different properties of weighting schemes. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WA.
18. Nelson, P. E. (1995). The Excalibur TREC-4 System, Preparations, and Results, In http://potomac.ncsl.nist.gov/TREC/ t4_proceedings.html, NIST, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899.
19. Noreault, T., Koll, M., & McGill, M. J. (1977). Automatic ranked output from boolean searches in SIRE. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28(6), 333-339.
20. Palermo, D., & Jenkins, J. (1964). Word association norms. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Radecki, T. (1988). Trends in research on information retrieval - the potential for improvement in conventional boolean retrieval systems. Information Processing & Management, 24(3), 219-227.
22. Robertson, S. E., & Sparck Jones, K. (1976). Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(3), 129-146.
23. Robertson, S. E., Walker, S., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. M. (1995). Large test collection experiments on an operational, interactive system: Okapi at TREC. Information Processing & Management, 31(3), 345-360.
24. Rocchio, J. J. (1971). Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In G. Salton (Ed.), The SMART retrieval system -experiments in automatic document processing (pp.313-323). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Salton, G., Fox, E. A., & Wu, H. (1983). Extended boolean information retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 26(12), 1022-1036.
27. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5), 513-523.
28. Salton, G. (1989). Automatic text processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1990). Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 288-297.
30. Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 197-216.
31. Sparck Jones, K. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28(1), 11-21.
32. Turtle, H., & Croft, W. B. (1991). Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(3), 187-222.
33. Wilbur, W. J., & Coffee, L. (1994). The effectiveness of document neighboring in search enhancement. Information Processing and Management, 30(2), 253-266.
34. Wong, W. Y. P., & Lee, D. L. (1993). Implementation of partial document ranking using inverted files. Information Processing and Management, 29(5), 647-669.