Synthesis and proton conductivity of highly sulfonated poly(thiophenylene)

Macromolecules

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 2941-2946

  Miyatake, Kenji ^a   Shouji, Eiichi ^a   Yamamoto, Kimihisa ^a   Tsuchida, Eishun ^a  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER CONCENTRATION; CHARACTERIZATION; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHANOL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POLYELECTROLYTES; PROTONS; SULFONATION; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; WATER;

POLYSULFONIUM CATION; POLYTHIOPHENYLENESULFONIC ACID; PROTON CONDUCTIVITY;

AROMATIC POLYMERS;

EID: 0031140775     PISSN: 00249297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ma961830t     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. (a) Glasser, L. Chem. Rev. 1975, 75, 21.
2. (b) Jensen, J., Kleitz, M., Eds. Solid State Protonic Conductors for Fuel Cells and Sensors; Odense University Press: Odense, 1982.
3. (c) Lasker, A., Chandra, S., Eds. Superionic Solid Electrolytes; Academic Press: Boston, 1990.
4. (d) Kreuer, K. D. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 610.
5. (a) Eisenberg, A., Yeager, H. L., Eds. Perfluorinated Ionomer Membranes; ACS Symposium Series 180; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.
6. (b) Mauritz, K. A. Macromolecules 1989, 22, 4483.
7. (c) Eisenberg, A.; Hird, B.; Moore R. B. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 4098.
8. (d) Perusich, S. A.; Avakian, P.; Keating, M. Y. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 4756.
9. Yea, S. C.; Eisenberg, A. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1977, 21, 875.
10. (a) Wallow, T. I.; Novak, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7411.
11. (b) Child, A. D.; Reynolds, J. R. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 1975.
12. (a) Jin, X.; Bishop, M. T.; Ellis, T. S.; Karasz, F. E. Br. Polym. J. 1985, 17, 4.
13. (b) Wang, F.; Roovers, J. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 5295.
14. (c) Bailly, C.; Williams, D. J.; Karasz, F. E.; MacKnight, W. J. Polymer 1987, 28, 1009.
15. (a) Chalk, A. J.; Hay, A. S. J. Polym. Sci. 1968, A7, 691.
16. (b) Chludzinski, P. J.; Fickett, A. P.; Lacanti, A. B. Polym. Prepr. 1971, 12, 276.
17. (a) Johnson, B. C.; Ylgor, I.; Iqbal, M.; Wrightman, J. P.; Lloyd, D. R.; McGrath, J. E. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 1984, 22, 72.
18. (b) Salle, R.; Sillion, B. FR Patent 2212356, 1974.
19. (c) Wei, X. L.; Wang, Y. Z.; Long, S. M.; Bobeczko, C.; Epstein, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2545.
20. (a) Short, J. N.; Hill, H. W., Jr. Chem. Technol. 1972, 2, 481.
21. (b) Brady, D. G. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1981, 36, 231.
22. (a) Giuffre, L.; Montoneri, E.; Modica, G.; Tempesti, E. Hydrogen Energy 1983, 8, 419.
23. (b) Montoneri, E.; Modica, G.; Giuffre, L.; Peraldo-Bicelli, C.; Maffi, S. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 1987, 11, 263.
24. (c) Montoneri, E. J. Polym. Sci. 1989, A27, 3043.
25. (d) Hruszka, P.; Jurga, J.; Brycki, B. Polymer 1992, 33, 248.
26. (a) Yamamoto, K.; Shouji, E.; Nishide, H.; Tsuchida, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5819.
27. (b) Tsuchida, E.; Shouji, E.; Yamamoto, K. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 7144.
28. (c) Tsuchida, E.; Yamamoto, K.; Miyatake, K.; Nishimura, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2843.
29. Miyatake, K.; Iyotani, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Tsuchida, E. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6969.
30. Stewart, J. J. P. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209; 1989, 10, 221.
31. Stewart, J. J. P. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209; 1989, 10, 221.
32. Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC: A General Molecular Orbital Package (version 6.00). QCPE Bull. 1990, 10, 86.
33. -1 attributed to aromatic C=C stretching. The value is in fair agreement with that obtained by elemental analysis.
34. Flory, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1947, 15, 684.
35. Mandelkern, L. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1959, 32, 1392.
36. Lovinger, A. J.; Davis, D. D.; Paddon, F. J., Jr. Polymer 1985, 26, 1595.
37. Cheng, S. Z. D.; Wunderlich, B. Thermochim. Acta 1988, 134, 161.
38. An insoluble portion was also found in water or DMF solution of the resulting polymer.
39. Gilbert, E. E. Sulfonation and Related Reactions; Interscience: New York, 1965; pp 425-538.
40. Falk, M. Can. J. Chem. 1980, 58, 1495.
41. The amount of water absorbed was determined as the difference between the weight of the dry sample and the weight of the sample equilibrated in a chamber where RH can be controlled. The consistency of the polymer varies from that of a solid at low RH to that of a pastelike material at high RH.