Integrating user and computer system concerns in the design of interactive systems

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 653-679

  Blandford, Ann E ^a   Duke, David J ^b  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTEGRATION; OPTIMIZATION; USER INTERFACES;

DESIGN PROCESS;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0031139504     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1997.0116     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. BARNARD, P. & HARRISON, M. (1989). Integrating cognitive and system models in human-computer interaction. In A. SUTCLIFFE & L. MACAULEY, Eds. People and Computers V, Proceedings of HCI'89, pp. 87-103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. BARNARD, P. J. & MAY, J. (1993). Cognitive modelling for user requirements. In P. F. BYERLEY, P. J. BARNARD, & J. MAY, Eds. Computers, Communication and Usability: Design Issues, Research and Methods for Integrated Services. pp. 101-145. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. BARNARD, P. J. & MAY, J. (1995). Interactions with advanced graphical interfaces and the deployment of latent human knowledge. In F. PATERNO', Ed. Proc. First Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems. pp. 15-49. Berlin: Springer.
4. BELLOTTI, V. (1993). Integrating theoreticians' and practitioners' perspectives with design rationale. Proceedings of InterCHI'93, pp. 101-114. New York: ACM Press.
5. BELLOTTI, V., BLANDFORD, A., DUKE, D., MACLEAN, A., MAY, J. & NIGAY, L. (in press). Controlling accessibility in computer mediated communications: a systematic analysis of the design space. Human-Computer Interaction Journal.
6. BELLOTTI, V., BUCKINGHAM-SHUM, S., MACLEAN, A. & HAMMOND, N. (1995). Multidisciplinary modelling in HCI design . . . in theory and in practice. In Proceedings of CHI'95: Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 146-153. New York: ACM Press.
7. BERNSEN, N. O. (1993). The structure of the design space. In P. F. BYERLEY, P. J. BARNARD & J. MAY, Eds. Computers, Communication and Usability: Design issues, research and methods for integrated services, pp. 221-244. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. BLANDFORD, A. E. & YOUNG, R. M. (1993). Developing runnable user models: Separating the problem solving techniques from the domain knowledge. In J. ALTY, D. DIAPER and S. GUEST, Eds. People and Computers VIII, Proceedings of HCI'93, Loughborough, pp. 111-122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. BLANDFORD, A. E. & YOUNG, R. M. (1995). Separating user and device descriptions for modelling interactive problem solving. In K. NORDBY, P. HELMERSEN, D. J. GILMORE & S. ARNESEN, Eds. Human-Computer Interaction: Interact'95. pp. 91-96. London: Chapman & Hall.
10. BLANDFORD, A. E. & YOUNG, R. M. (1996). Specifying user knowledge for the design of interactive systems. Software Engineering Journal, 11.6, 323-333.
11. BLANDFORD, A. E. & YOUNG, R. M. (submitted). Applying Programmable User Models to Real Design Problems. AMODEUS2 Project Document UM/WP30.
12. BLANDFORD, A. E., HARRISON, M. D. & BARNARD, P. J. (1993). Integrating user requirements and system specification. In P. F. BYERLEY, P. J. BARNARD & J. MAY, Eds., Computers, Communication and Usability: Design Issues, Research and Methods for Integrated Services, pp. 165-196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. BLANDFORD, A. E., HARRISON, M. D. & BARNARD, P. J. (1995). Using Interaction Framework to guide the design of interactive systems International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 101-130.
14. BOVAIR, S., KIERAS, D. & POLSON, P. (1990). The acquisition and performance of text-editing skill: a cognitive complexity analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1-48.
15. BOWEN J. P. & HINCHEY, M. G. (1995). Ten commandments of formal methods. IEEE Computer, 28, 56-63.
16. BUCKINGHAM SHUM, S., BLANDFORD, A., DUKE, D., GOOD, J., MAY, J., PATERNO', F. & YOUNG, R. M. (1996). Multidisciplinary modelling for user-centred system design: an air-traffic control case study. In A. SASSE, J. CUNNINGHAM & R. WINDER, Eds. People and Computers XI. Proceedings of HCI'96, pp. 201-219. London: Springer.
17. BYRNE, M., WOOD, S., SUKAVIRIYA, P., FOLEY, J. & KIERAS, D. (1994). Automating interface evaluation. In: Proceedings of CHI'94, pp. 232-237. New York: ACM.
18. CARD, S.K., MORAN, T.P. & NEWELL, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. COUTAZ, J., NIGAY, L., SALBER, D., BLANDFORD, A., MAY, J. & YOUNG, R. (1995). Four easy pieces for assessing the usability of multimodal interaction: the CARE properties. In K. NORDBY, P. HELMERSEN, D. J. GILMORE and S. ARNESEN, Eds. (1995). Human-Computer Interaction: Interact'95, pp. 115-120. London: Chapman & Hall.
20. DUKE, D. J. (1995). Reasoning about gestural interaction. Computer Graphics Forum. 14. Proceedings of Eurographics '95, pp. 55-66. NCC/Blackwell,
21. DUKE, D. J., BARNARD, P. J., DUCE, D. A. & MAY, J. (1995). Systematic development of the human interface. Proceedings of Second Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC'95, pp. 313-321. New York: IEEE Computer Society Press.
22. DUKE, D. J., BARNARD, P. J., DUCE, D. A. & MAY, J. (submitted). Syndetic Modelling. (Also) AMODEUS2 Project Document ID/WP49.
23. DUKE, D. J. & HARRISON, M. D. (1993). Abstract interaction objects. Computer Graphics Forum 12, 25-36. NCC/Blackwell.
24. DUKE, D. J. & HARRISON, M. D. (1994). A theory of presentations. In M. NAFTALIN, T. DENVIR & M. BERTRAN, Eds. FME'94: Industrial Benefit of Formal Methods, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 873, pp. 271-290. Berlin: Springer.
25. GOULD, J. D. (1988). How to design usable systems. In M. HELANDER, Ed. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 757-789. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
26. GREEN, T. R. G. (1990). The cognitive dimension of viscosity: a sticky problem for HCI. In D. DIAPER, D. GILMORE, G. COCKTON & B. SHACKEL, Eds. Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT '90. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
27. GREEN, T. R. G. & PETRE, M. (1996). Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a 'cognitive dimensions' framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7, 131-174.
28. HALL, A. (1990). Seven myths of formal methods. IEEE Software, September, pp. 11-19.
29. HARTSON, H. R., SIOCHI, A. C. & HIX, D. (1992). The UAN: a user-oriented representation for direct manipulation interface designs. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 8, 181-203.
30. JOHN, B. & KIERAS, D. (1996). The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on CHI, 3, 320-351.
31. KIERAS, D. E. & POLSON, P. G. (1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 22, 365-394.
32. KIERAS, D., WOOD, S., ABOTEL, K. & HORNOF, A. (1995). GLEAN: A computer-based tool for rapid GOMS model usability evaluation for user interface design. Proceedings of the UIST '95. pp. 91-100.
33. LANDAUER, T. K. (1995). The Trouble with Computers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. MACLEAN, A. & MCKERLIE, D. (1995). Design Space Analysis and Use-Representations. In J. M. CARROLL, Ed. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, pp. 183-208. New York: Wiley.
35. MACLEAN, A., YOUNG, R., BELLOTTI, V. & MORAN, T. (1991). Questions, options and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 201-250.
36. MOHER, T. G. & DIRDA, V. (1995). Revising mental models to accomodate expectation failures in human-computer dialogues. In R. BASTIDE & P. PALANQUE, Eds. DSV-IS'95: Second Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, pp. 76-92. Berlin: Springer.
37. NIGAY, L. (1994). Conception et Modélisation Logicielles des Systèmes Interactifs. Ph.D. Thèse de l'Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble.
38. NORMAN, D. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In D.A. NORMAN & S.W. DRAPER, Eds. User Centered System Design, pp. 31-62. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. PATERNO', F. & MEZZANOTTE, M. (1995). Formal Analysis of User and System Interactions in the CERD Case Study. In Proceedings of IFIP Conference on Engineering HCI. London: Chapman & Hall.
40. PATERNO', F., SCIACCHITANO, M. S. & LÖWGREN, J. (1995). User Interface Evaluation Mapping Physical User Actions to Task-Driven Formal Specification. In R. BASTIDE & P. PALANQUE, Eds. Proceedings of The 2nd Workshop On Design, Specification, Verification Of Interactive Systems, pp. 35-53. Berlin: Springer.
41. RAMSAY, J. & BERNSEN, O. (1995). AMODEUS II Shared Modelling Exercise - DSD Modelling Technique Report on the CERD Exemplar. Amodeus Project Document ID/WP33.
42. RYAN, M., FIADEIRO, J. & MAIBAUM, T. (1991). Sharing actions and attributes in modal action logic. In T. ITO and A. R. MEYER, Eds. Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software, Vol. 526, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer.
43. SALBER, D., COUTAZ, J., NIGAY, L., FACONTI, G., PATERNO, F., DUKE, D. & HARRISON, M. (1994). The System Modelling Glossary. Amodeus Project Document SM/WP26.
44. SIMON, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge: MIT Press.
45. SZEKELY, P., LOU, P. & NECHES, R. (1992). Facilitating the exploration of interface design alternatives; the HUMANOID model of interface design. In Proceedings of CHI '92, pp. 507-515. New York: ACM.
46. TEASDALE, J. & BARNARD, P. (1993). Affect, Cognition and Change. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. TREU, S. (1992). Interface structures: conceptual, logical and physical patterns applicable to human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37, 565-593.
48. VERJANS, S. (1994). Computer semiotics as a basis for integrating different views on Human-Computer Interaction. Amodeus Project Document TM/WP10.
49. WHARTON, C., RIEMAN, J., LEWIS, C. & POLSON, P. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide. In J. NIELSON & R. MACK, Eds. Usability Inspection Methods. pp. 105-140. New York: Wiley.
50. YOUNG, R. M. & BLANDFORD, A. E. (submitted). Knowledge and architecture as determinants of cognition: interaction with complex devices.
51. YOUNG, R. M., GREEN, T. R. G. & SIMON, T. (1989). Programmable user models for predictive evaluation of interface designs. In K. BICE & C. LEWIS, Eds. Proceedings of CHI '89, pp. 15-19. New York: ACM.