On the problem of bias in political argumentation: An investigation into discussions about political asylum in Germany and Austria

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 555-585

  Kienpointner, Manfred ^a   Kindt, Walther ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031138836     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00035-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Apothéloz, Denis, Pierre-Yves Brandt, and Gustave Quirez, 1993: The function of negation in argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 23-38.
2. Aristotle, 1959. Rhetoric. Ed. by W.D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Aristotle, 1960. Posterior analytics. Ed. and transl. by H. Tredennick. Topica. Ed. and transl. by E.S. Forster. London: Heinemann.
4. Blair, J. Anthony, 1992. Premissary relevance. Argumentation 6: 203-217.
5. Cicero, 1951. De oratore. Ed. by A.S. Wilkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Freeley, Austin J., 1986. Argumentation and debate. Belmont: Wadsworth.
7. Garssen, Bart, 1994. Recognizing argumentation schemes. In: F.H. Van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst, eds., Studies in pragma-dialectics, 105-111. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
8. Green-Pedersen, Niels J., 1984. The tradition of the topics in the Middle Ages. München: Philosophia.
9. Grice, H. Paul, 1975. The logic of conversation. In: P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, eds., Syntax and semantics, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
10. Gruber, Helmut, 1993: Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics 3: 1-28.
11. Kienpointner, Manfred, 1992a. Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
12. Kienpointner, Manfred, 1992b. How to classify arguments. In: F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and Ch.A. Willard, eds., Argumentation illuminated, 178-188. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
13. Kienpointner, Manfred, 1993. The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric. Argumentation 7: 419-437.
14. Kienpointner, Manffed, 1996. Vernünftig argumentieren. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
15. Kindt, Walther, 1988. Zur Logik von Alltagsargumentationen. Fachberichte Informatik der EWH Koblenz 3: 1-48.
16. Kindt, Walther, 1992a. Organisationsformen des Argumentierens in natürlicher Sprache. In: H. Paschen and L. Wigger, eds., Pädagogisches Argumentieren, 95-120. Weinheim: Deutscher Studienverlag.
17. Kindt, Walther, 1992b. Argumentation und Konfliktaustragung in Äußerungen über den Golfkrieg. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 11: 189-215.
18. Pater, W.A. de, 1965. Les topiques d'Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne. Fribourg: Ed. Saint Paul.
19. Paul, Richard W., 1987. Critical thinking in the strong sense and the role of argumentation in everyday life. In: F.H. Van Eemeren. R. Grootendorst. J.A. Blair and Ch.A. Willard, eds., Argumentation: Across the lines of disciplines, 379-382. Dordrechl: Foris.
20. Peirce, Charles S., 1973. Lectures on pragmatism/Vorlesungen über Pragmatismus. Ed. and transl. by E. Walther. Hamburg: Meiner.
21. Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, 1971. The New Rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
22. Quintilianus, 1970. Institutio oratoria. Ed. by M. Winterbottom. 2 vols. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
23. Schellens, Peter J., 1985. Redelijke argumenten. Utrecht: ICC Printing-Dordrecht.
24. Toulmin, Stephen, 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke and Allan Janik, 1984. An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
26. Van Dijk, Teun A., 1992. Racism and argumentation: Race riot rhetoric tabloid editorials. In: F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and Ch.A. Willard. eds., Argumentation illuminated, 243-259. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
27. Van Dijk, Teun A., 1993. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Van Dijk, Teun A. and Walter Kintsch, 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
29. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst, 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.
30. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst, 1992. Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Van Eemeren, Hans H. and Rob Grootendorst, eds., 1994. Studies in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
32. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Tjark Kruiger, 1987. Identifying argumentation schemes. In: F.H. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and Ch.A. Willard, eds., Argumentation, Perspectives and approaches. 70-81.
33. Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs, 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
34. Walton, Douglas, 1991. Bias, critical doubt, and fallacies. Argumentation and Advocacy 28: 1-22.
35. Wallon, Douglas, 1992. The place of emotion in argument. University Park. PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
36. Warnick, Barbara, and Susan L. Kline, 1992. The New Rhetoric's argument schemes: A rhetorical view of practical reasoning. Argumentation and Advocacy 29: 1-15.
37. Woods, John and Douglas Walton, 1989. Fallacies: Selected papers 1972-1987. Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter.
38. Wodak, Ruth et al., 1990. 'Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter'. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.