Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint: Three-dimensional reconstruction and anatomic analysis

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 193-199

  Martinelli, Mark J ^a,b   Kuriashkin, Igor V ^a   Carragher, Bridget O ^a   Clarkson, Robert B ^a   Baker, Gordon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3 dimensional reconstruction; Analyze ; Anatomy; Equine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metacarpophalangeal joint

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FORELIMB; HISTOLOGY; HORSE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; JOINT; LIGAMENT; METACARPAL BONE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SESAMOID BONE; SYNOVIAL FLUID; TENDON;

ANIMALS; FORELIMB; HORSES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JOINTS; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METACARPUS; SESAMOID BONES; SOFTWARE; SYNOVIAL FLUID; TENDONS;

EID: 0031138093     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1997.tb00840.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Rothschild PA, Crooks LE, Margulis AR. Direction of MR imaging. Invest Radiol 1990;25:275-281.
2. Peterfy CG, Linares R, Steinbatch LS. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiol Clin of NA 1994;32:291-311.
3. Reicher MA, Rauschning W, Gold RH, Bassett LW, Lufkin RB, Glen W. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint: normal anatomy. Amer Journ of Roent 1985;145:895-902.
4. Karkkainen M, Punto LU, Talamo RM. Magnetic resonance imaging of canine degenerative lumbar spine diseases. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1993;34:399-904.
5. Morgan RV, Daniel GB, Donnell RL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal eye and orbit of the dog and cat. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1994;35:102-108.
6. Ramsey DT, Gerding PA, Losonsky JM, Kuriashkin IV, Clarkson RB. Comparative value of diagnostic imaging techniques in a cat with exophthalmos. Vet and Comp Ophth 1994;4:198-202.
7. Thomson CE, Kornegay JN, Burn RA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging - a general overview of principles and examples in veterinary neurodiagnosis. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1993;34:2-17.
8. Van Bree H, Degryse H, Van Ryssen B, Ramon F, Desmidt M. Pathologic correlations with magnetic resonance images of osteochondrosis lesions in canine shoulders. Journ Amer Vet Med Assoc 1993;202: 1099-1105.
9. Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Braunstein EM, Visco DM, O'Connor BL. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging and application to the stifle joint in dogs. Journ Amer Vet Med Assoc 1991;198;1914-1922.
10. O'Callaghan MW. Future Diagnostic Methods: A brief look at new technologies and their potential application to equine diagnosis. In: Steckel RR, ed. The Vet Clin of North Am Eq Prac: Advanced Diagnostic Methods, vol 7. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1991:467-479.
11. Park RD, Nelson TR, Hoopes PJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine digit and metacarpophalangeal joint. Vet Radiol 1987; 28:105-116.
12. Crass JR, Genovese RL, Render JA, Bellon EM. Magnetic resonance, ultrasound and histopathological correlation of acute and healing equine tendon injuries. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1992;33:206-216.
13. Denoix JM, Crevier N, Roger B, Lebas JF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1993;34:405-411.
14. Robb RA. A software system for interactive and quantitative analysis of biomedical images. In: 3D Imaging in Medicine. Ed: K.H. Hohne et al. 1993;F60:333-361.