Interactive videodisc instruction is an alternative method for learning and performing a critical nursing skill

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 155-158

  Deamicis, Patricia A ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactive videodisc instruction; Intravenous therapy skills; Traditional lecture demonstration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; VIDEORECORDING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CRITICAL CARE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEODISC RECORDING;

EID: 0031137644     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Heath A. The live supervision form. In: Hansen J, ed. Diagnosis and Assessment in Family Therapy. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems; 1983:143-149.
2. Montalvo B. Aspects of live supervision. Family Process. 1973;12:343-359.
3. Seabury B, Maple F Jr. Using computers to teach practice skills. Social Work. 1993;38:430-439.
4. Laurillard D, Taylor J. Designing the stepping stones: An evaluation of interactive media in the classroom. Journal of Educational Television. 1994;20:169-184.
5. Froman R, Hence C, Neafsey P. A comparative assessment of interactive videodisc instruction. Comput Nurs. 1993;11:236-241.
6. Bosco JJ. An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. Educational Technology. 1986;5:7-17.
7. McNeil B, Nelson K. Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10-year review of achievement effects, journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 1991;18:1-6.
8. Williams CJ, Brown SW. A review of the research issues in the use of computer-related technologies for instruction: An agenda for Research. International Journal of Instructional Media. 1990;17:95-108.
9. Clark RE. Evidence of confounding in computer-based instructional studies: Analyzing the meta-analysis. Educational Communications and Technology Journal. 1985;33:249-262.
10. Reeves TC. Research and evaluation models for study of interactive video. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 1986;13:102-106.
11. Rizzolo MA. Factors influencing the development and use of interactive video in nursing education. Comput Nurs. 1990;8:151-159.
12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191-215.
13. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
14. Huffman JL, Waters K. Some effects of student personality on success with computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology. 1982;21:20-21.
15. Dalton D, Hannafin MJ, Hooper S. Effects of individual and cooperative computer assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development. 1989;27: 15-25.
16. Billings DM. Effects of BSN student preferences for studying alone or in groups on performance and attitude when using interactive videodisc instruction. J Nurs Educ. 1994;33:322-324.
17. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Computer-assisted cooperative learning. Educational Technology. 1986;26:12-18.
18. McAfooes J. Intravenous Therapy. Athen, OH: Fuld Institute for Technology in Nursing Education; 1989. Interactive video instruction.
19. Patricia A. DeAmicis, BSN, MS, is a faculty member of the Department of Nursing, Worchester State College, Worchester, Massachusetts, and is an EdD candidate at the University of Massachusetts College of Education, Lowell, Massachusetts.