|
|
Volumn 19, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 13-15
|
|
"There is no substantive due process right to conduct human-subject research": the saga of the Minnesota Gamma Hydroxybutyrate Study.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
NEW DRUG;
ADDICTION;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
PERSONNEL;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
PUNISHMENT;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
UNIVERSITY;
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DRUGS, INVESTIGATIONAL;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICS;
ETHICS COMMITTEES;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
PUNISHMENT;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;
SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;
UNIVERSITIES;
|
|
EID: 0031129005
PISSN: 01937758
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3564519 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
