Effects of lecture rate on students' comprehension and ratings of topic importance

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 260-267

  Robinson, Sheri L ^a   Sterling, Heather E ^a   Skinner, Christopher H ^a   Robinson, Daniel H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031120082     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0929     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Apple, W., Streeter, L. A., & Krauss, R. M. (1979). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 715-727.
2. Alley, G., & Deshler, D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and methods. Denver: Love.
3. Barker, L. L. (1971). Listening behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, O. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook 1. The cognitive domain. White Plains, NY: Longman.
5. Carver, R. P. (1982). Optimal rate of reading prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 56-88.
6. Fairbanks, G., Guttman, N., & Miron, M. S. (1957). Auditory comprehension of repeated high speed messages. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22, 20-22.
7. Friedman, P. G. (1978). Listening processes: Attention, understanding, evaluation. Washington, D.C.: Natl. Education Assoc.
8. Garvey, W. D. (1953). The intelligibility of speeded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 102-108.
9. Goldstein, H. (1940). Reading and listening comprehension at various controlled rates. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia Univ.
10. Griffin, R. W., & Cashin, W. E. (1989). The lecture and discussion method for management education: Pros and cons. Journal of Management Development, 8, 25-32.
11. Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook 2. Affective domain. New York: McKay.
12. LaBarbera, P., & MacLachlan, J. (1979). Time-compressed speech in radio advertising. Journal of Marketing, 43, 30-36.
13. Ladas, H. S. (1980). Note taking on lectures: An information-processing approach. Educational Psychologist, 15, 44-53.
14. MacLachlan, J., & Siegel, M. H. (1982). Reducing the cost of TV commercials by use of time compression. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 52-57.
15. Miller, N., Maruyama, G., Beaber, R. J., & Valone, K. (1976). Speed of speech and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 615-625.
16. Murray, J. P., & Murray, J. I. (1992). How do I lecture thee? College Teaching, 40, 109-113.
17. Scerbo, M. W., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Grasha, A. F. (1992). The role of time and cueing in a college lecture. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 312-328.
18. Wood, C. D. (1965). Comprehension of compressed speech by elementary school children. Bloomington, IN: Audio-Visual Center, Indiana Univ.