Uncertainty analysis of groundwater flow with DRBEM

Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 217-221

  El Harrouni, K ^a   Ouazar, D ^a   Wrobel, L C ^b   Cheng, A H D ^c  

^a MOHAMMED V UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary element method; Dual reciprocity boundary element method; Groundwater; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; AQUIFERS; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY;

DUAL RECIPROCITY BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; FIRST ORDER APPROXIMATION OF COVARIANCES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031119818     PISSN: 09557997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-7997(97)00006-4     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Iman, R. L. & Conover, W. J. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with application to risk assessment. Common. Statist. Math., 1980, A9, 1749-842.
2. Smith, L. & Freeze, R. A. Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 1. One-dimensional simulations. Water Resour. Res., 1979, 15, 521-8.
3. Smith, L. & Freeze, R. A. Stochastic analysis of steady-state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 2. Two-dimensional simulations. Water Resour. Res., 1979, 15, 1543-59.
4. Bakr, A. A., Gelhar, L. W., Gutjahr, A. L. & MacMillan, J. R. Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows, 1. Comparison of one- and three-dimensional flows. Water Resour. Res., 1978, 14, 263-71.
5. Cheng, A.H-D. & Ouazar, D. The solution under aquifer parameter uncertainty. Ground Water, 1995, 33, 11-15.
6. Indelman, P., Dagan, G., Cheng, A. H-D. & Ouazar, D. Sensitivity analysis of flow in multiple leaky aquifer systems. J. Hydr. Engng., ASCE, 1996, 122, 41-5.
7. Sagar, B. Galerkin finite element procedure for analyzing flow through porous media. Water Resour. Res., 1978, 14, 1035-44.
8. Dettinger, M. D. & Wilson, J. L. First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow, 1. Mathematical development. Water Resour. Res., 1981, 17, 148-61.
9. Dagan, G. Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities, 1. Conditional simulation and direct problem. Water Resour. Res., 1982, 18, 813-33.
10. Dagan, G. Analysis of flow through heterogeneous random aquifers by the method of embedding matrix, 1. Steady flow. Water Resour. Res., 1981, 17, 107-21.
11. Cheng, A. H-D. & Lafe, O. E. Boundary element for stochastic groundwater flow: random boundary condition and recharge. Water Resour. Res., 1991, 27, 231-42.
12. Cheng, A. H-D., Abousleiman, Y., Ruan, F. & Lafe, O. E. Boundary element solution for stochastic groundwater flow: temporal weakly stationary problems. Water Resour. Res., 1993, 29, 2893-908.
13. Lafe, O. E. & Cheng, A. H-D. A global interpolation function based boundary element method for deterministic, non-homogeneous and stochastic flows in porous media. Computers and Structures, 1995, 56, 861-70
14. Bear, J. Hydraulics of Groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
15. El Harrouni, K., Ouazar, D., Wrobel, L. C. & Cheng, A. H-D. Global interpolation function based DRBEM applied to Darcy's flow in heterogeneous media. Engng. Anal. Boundary Elements, 1995, 16, 281-285.
16. Hoeksema, R. J. & Kitanidis, P. K., Prediction of transmissivities, heads, and seepage velocities using mathematical modelling and geostatistics. Adv. Water Resources, 1989, 12, 90-102.
17. Journel, A. G. Constrained interpolation and quantitative information. The soft kriging approach. Math. Geol., 1986, 18, 269-86.