Spin glasses and frustrated percolation: A renormalization group approach

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Volumn 237, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 353-362

  Pezzella, Umberto ^a   Coniglio, Antonio ^a  

^a INFM   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; GLASS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHASE TRANSITIONS;

CLUSTER PHYSICS; FRUSTRATED PERCOLATION; HAMILTONIAN FORMALISM; SPIN GLASSES;

FERROMAGNETISM;

EID: 0031119394     PISSN: 03784371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(96)00434-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. K. Binder and A.P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 (1986) 801; M. Mezard, G. Parisi and M.A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
2. K. Binder and A.P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 (1986) 801; M. Mezard, G. Parisi and M.A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
3. For a review see for example M.D. Ediger, C.A. Angell and S.R. Nagel, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 13 200.
4. A. Coniglio, Il Nuovo Cimento, D 16 (1994) 1027.
5. ij when these variables represent interactions between the particles internal degree of freedom. Sec M. Nicodemi and A. Coniglio, to be published.
6. S. Scarpetta, A. de Candia and A. Coniglio, to be published.
7. A. Coniglio and H.J. Herrmann, Physica A 225 (1996) 1, M. Nicodemi A. Coniglio and H.J. Herrmann, to Phys. Rev. Lett., submitted.
8. A. Coniglio and H.J. Herrmann, Physica A 225 (1996) 1, M. Nicodemi A. Coniglio and H.J. Herrmann, to Phys. Rev. Lett., submitted.
9. A. Coniglio, F. di Liberto, G. Monroy and F. Peruggi, Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991) 12 605.
10. A connection between the dilute spin glass at zero temperature and the 1/2 state Potts model has been discussed by A. Aharony and Pfeuty J. Phys. C 12 (1979) L125.
11. ij is path independent since the configuration does not contain frustrated loops (Fig. 2(b)).
12. Y. Meir, A. Aharony and A. B. Harris, Europhys. Lett. 10 (1989) 275. and references therein.
13. S.G. Glotzer and A. Coniglio, J. Comput. Math. Sci. 4 (1995) 324, N. Jan, S.C. Glotzer, P.H. Poole and A. Coniglio. Fractals, 3 (1990) 465.
14. S.G. Glotzer and A. Coniglio, J. Comput. Math. Sci. 4 (1995) 324, N. Jan, S.C. Glotzer, P.H. Poole and A. Coniglio. Fractals, 3 (1990) 465.
15. C.M. Fortuin and P.W. Kasteleyn, Physica 57 (1972) 536.
16. A. Coniglio and W. Klein, J. Phys. A 13 (1980) 2775.
17. V. Cataudella, A. Coniglio, L. de Arcangelis and F. di Liberto, Physica A 192 (1993) 167.
18. Note that in the limit q → 0 we obtain the frustrated tree percolation, which allows the same configurations as in the random tree percolation since the trees do not contain frustration. Therefore the frustrated q-Potts model (4) and the ferromagnetic q-Potts model coincide in the limit q → 0.
19. S.R. McKay, A.N. Berker and S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 767; and J. Appl. Phys. 53, (1982) 1873.
20. S.R. McKay, A.N. Berker and S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 767; and J. Appl. Phys. 53, (1982) 1873.
21. In the Hamiltonian (4) the term - 2 has been added so that the energy between two sites is zero if the interaction is satisfied. With this choice the partition function is given exactly by (5). Otherwise the partition function would have been multiplied by an unessential factor.
22. Further details will appear in U. Pezzella and A. Coniglio, to be published.
23. L. de Arcangelis, A. Coniglio and F. Peruggi, Europhys. Lett. 14 (1991) 515.
24. R.H. Swendsen and J.S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 86.
25. N. Kawashima and A.P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 53 (1996) R484.
26. V. Cataudella, Physica A 183 (1991) 249.
27. A.T. Ogielski, Phys. Rev. B 32 (1985) 7384.
28. A. Fierro, A. De Candia and A. Coniglio, to be published.
29. See also I.A. Campbell and L. Bernardi, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 12 643.
30. T. Tomida and T. Egami, Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 3290.
31. D. Kivelson et al., Physica A 219 (1995) 27.
32. M. Adam, M. Delsanti, J.P. Munch and D. Durand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 706.