Interrater Reliability of the Technology Team Assessment Process

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 297-302

  Embleton, Amy J ^a   Spencer, Karen C ^b  

^a Children's Seashore House   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation process, occupational therapy; Reliability of tests; Self help devices

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SELF HELP; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CHILD; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SELF-HELP DEVICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031114452     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.51.4.297     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Angelo, J. (1992). Comparison of three computer scanning modes as an interface method for persons with cerebral palsy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 217-222.
2. Bain, B. K. (1995, June). Steps in a problem-solving evaluation for assistive technology. Technology Special Interest Section Newsletter, 5(2), 1-3.
3. Bartko, J. J., & Carpenter, W. T. (1976). On the methods and theory of reliability. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163, 307-317.
4. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
5. Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. (1995). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
6. Currier, D. P. (1990). Elements of research in physical therapy (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
7. DeRuyter, F. (1995). Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: Do we understand the commitment? Assistive Technology, 7, 3-8.
8. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Holder-Brown, L., & Parette, H. P., Jr. (1992). Children with disabilities who use assistive technology: Ethical considerations. Young Children, 47(6), 73-77.
10. Hutinger, P. L. (1993). Technology Team Assessment Process final report. Macomb, IL: Western Illinois University, College of Education.
11. Hutinger, P. L. (1994). State of practice: How assistive technologies are used in educational programs of children with multiple disabilities. A final report for the project: Effective use of technology to meet educational goals of children with disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 378 721)
12. Hutinger, P. L., & Gentry, D. (1986). Microcomputer applications for young handicapped students: Report from the ACTT symposium. Journal of the Division for Early Studenthood, 10, 240-246.
13. Hutinger, P. L., Johanson, J., Robinson, L., & Schneider, C. (1992). The Technology Team Assessment Process. Macomb, IL: Western Illinois University, College of Education.
14. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic.
15. Male, M. (1994). Technology for inclusion: Meeting the special needs of all students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Mann, W. C., & Lane, J. P. (1991). Assistive technology for persons with disabilities: The role of occupational therapy. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
17. National Council on Disability. (1993). Study on the financing of assistive technology devices and services for individuals with disabilities. A report to the President and Congress of the United States. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 696)
18. Parette, H. P., Jr., Hourcade, J. J., & VanBiervliet, A. (1993). Selection of appropriate technology for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Students, 25(3), 18-22.
19. Polloway, E. A., & Patton, J. R. (1993). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
20. Rainforth, B., York, J., & Macdonald, C. (1992). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
21. Reed, P., & Bowser, G. (1991). The role of the occupational and physical therapist in assistive technology. Tech use guide: Using computer technology. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Students, Center for Special Education Technology.