Re: Congruence and Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Perching Bird Cytochrome b Sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 266-271

  Edwards, Scott V ^a   Arctander, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVES; CATHARUS GUTTATUS; GALLIFORMES; PASSERIFORMES;

CYTOCHROME B; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; BIRD; CHIMERA; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; LETTER; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; CHIMERA; CYTOCHROME B GROUP; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0031114199     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0378     Document Type: Editorial

References (33)

1. Arctander P. Comparison of a mitochondrial gene and a corresponding nuclear pseudogene. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 262:1995;13-19.
2. Avise J. C., Nelson W. S. Reply. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 4:1995;350-356.
3. Cao Y., Adachi J., Janke A., Pääbo S., Hasegawa M. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: Instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol. 39:1994;519-527.
4. Christidis L., Schodde R. Relationships of Australo-Papuan songbirds - Protein evidence. Ibis. 133:1991;277-285.
5. Clark A. G., Whittam T. S. Sequencing errors and molecular evolutionary analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;744-752.
6. Cracraft J., Helm-Bychowski K. Parsimony and phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: Some methodological strategies. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. p. 184-220.
7. Cummings M. P., Otto S. P., Wakeley J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;814-822.
8. Edwards S. V. Relevance of microevolutionary processes to higher level molecular systematics. Mindell D. P. Avian Molecular Systematics and Evolution. 1997;Academic Press, San Diego.
9. Edwards S. V., Wilson A. C. Phylogenetically informative length polymorphism and sequence variability in mitochondrial DNA of Australian songbirds (Pomatostomus). Genetics. 126:1990;695-711.
10. Edwards S. V., Arctander P. Retraction of a thrush cytochrome b sequence. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 263:1996;323.
11. Edwards S. V., Arctander P., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial resolution of a deep branch in the genealogical tree for perching birds. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 243:1991;99-107.
12. Farris J. S., Källersjo M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:1994;315-319.
13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;789-791.
14. J. Felsenstein, 1994, Phylogeny Inference Package (PHYLIP), Department of Genetics, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
15. Fitch W. M. Toward finding the tree of maximum parsimony. Estabrook G. F. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Numerical Taxonomy. 1975;189-230 Freeman, San Francisco.
16. Fitch D. H. A., Mainone C., Goodman M., Slightom J. L. Molecular history of gene conversions in the primate fetal γ-globin genes. J. Biol. Chem. 265:1990;781-793.
17. Fukami-Kobayashi K., Tateno Y. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 32:1991;79-91.
18. Hackett S. J., Griffiths C. S., Bates J. M., Klein N. K. A commentary on the use of sequence data for phylogeny reconstruction. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 4:1995;350-353.
19. Helm-Bychowski K., Cracraft J. Recovering phylogenetic signal from DNA sequences: Relationships within the corvine assemblage (class Aves) as inferred from complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome-b gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1196-1214.
20. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order of the Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;170-179.
21. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Pääbo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:1989;6196-6200.
22. Lanyon S. M., Hall J. G. Reexamination of barbet monophyly using mitochondrial-DNA sequence data. Auk. 111:1994;389-397.
23. W. P. Maddison, D. R. Maddison, 1992, MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
24. Miyamoto M. M., Allard M. W., Adkins R. M., Janecek L. L., Honeycutt R. L. A congruence test of reliability using linked mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;236-249.
25. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
26. Sheldon F. H., Bledsoe A. H. Avian molecular systematics: 1970s to 1990s. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:1993;243-278.
27. Sibley C. G., Ahlquist J. E. The phylogeny and classification of the Australo-Papuan passerine birds. Emu. 85:1985;1-14.
28. C. G. Sibley, J. E. Ahlquist, 1990, The Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
29. Smith M. F., Thomas W. K., Patton J. L. Mitochondrial DNA-like sequence in the nuclear genome of an akadontine rodent. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;204-215.
30. Sneath P. H. A., Sackin M. J., Ambler R. P. Detecting evolutionary incompatibilities from protein sequences. Syst. Zool. 24:1975;311-332.
31. D. L. Swofford, 1991a, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP), Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
32. Swofford D. L. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? Miyamoto M, Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991b;295-333 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
33. Templeton A. R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution. 37:1983;221-244.