Flood routing in a wide channel with a quadratic lag-and-route method;Propagation de crue dans un canal large par une méthode combinant délai et stockage dans un réservoir quadratique

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 169-189

  Bentura, Piter L F ^a,b   Michel, Claude ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGY; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPEN CHANNEL FLOW; RIVER DIVERSION;

FLOOD ROUTING; QUADRATIC LAG AND ROUTE METHODS;

FLOOD CONTROL;

CHANNEL; FLOOD ROUTING; HYDROLOGY;

CHANNEL HYDRAULICS; FLOOD ROUTING; LAG-AND-ROUTE METHOD;

EID: 0031111823     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626669709492018     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baptista, M., and Michel, C., 1989. Une utilisation simple du modèle Hayami en hydrologie (A simple use of the Hayami model in hydrology). La Houille Blanche, 2:123–130.
2. Baptista, M., and Michel, C., 1990. Influence des caractéristiques des biefs sur la propagation des pointes de crue (Influence of channel characteristics on peak flow propagation). La Houille Blanche, 2:141–148.
3. Becker, A., and Kundzewicz, Z. W., 1987. Non-linear flood routing with multilinear models. Wat. Resour. Res., 23 (6):1043–1048.
4. Boyd, M. J., David, H., Pilgrim and Cordery, I., 1979. A storage routing model based on catchment geomorphology. J. Hydrol., 42:209–230.
5. Bravo, R., Dow, D. A., and Rogers, J. R., 1994. Parameter determination for the Muskingum-Cunge flood routing method. Wat. Resour. Bull. AWRA, 30 (5):891–899.
6. Cunge, J. A., 1969. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). J. Hydraul. Res., 7 (2):205–230.
7. Diskin, M. H., and Ding, Y., 1994. Channel routing independent of length subdivision. Wat. Resour. Res., 30 (5):1529–1534.
8. Dooge, J. C. I., Strupczewski, W. G., and Napiorkowski, J. J., 1982. Hydrodynamic derivation of storage parameters of the Muskingum model. J. Hydrol., 54:371–387.
9. Gill, M. A., 1992. Numerical solution of Muskingum equation. J. Hydraul. Engng Div. ASCE, 118 (5):804–809.
10. Gill, M. A., Dooge, J. C. I., Perumal, M., and Wang, Q. J., 1994. J. Irrig. Drain. Engng, 120 (3):695–697.
11. Guang-Te, W., and Singh, V. P., 1992. Muskingum method with variable parameters for flood routing in channels. J. Hydrol., 134:57–76.
12. Hayami, S., 1951. “ On the propagation of flood waves. ”. In Bull. 1, Disaster Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., Japan 1–16.
13. Hjelmfelt, A. T., 1985. Negative outflows from Muskingum flood routing. J. Hydraul. Engng Div. ASCE, 111 (6):1010–1014.
14. Kohler, M. A., 1958. Mechanical analogs aid graphical flood routing. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE, 84 (HY2), paper 1585
15. Laurenson, E. M., and Mein, R. G., 1995. “ Hydrograph synthesis by runoff routing. ”. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology Edited by:Singh, V. P., 151–164. Colorado, USA:Water Resources Publications.
16. Lettenmaier, D. P., and Wood, E. F., 1993. “ Chapter 26 ”. In Handbook of Hydrology Edited by:Maidment, D. R., New York, USA:McGraw-Hill. Hydrological forecasting. in:ed. by
17. Malone, T. A., and Cordery, I., 1989. “ An assessment of network models in flood forecasting. ”. In New Directions of Surface Water Modelling (Proc. Baltimore Symp., May 1989), IAHS Publ. no. 181 Edited by:Kavvas, M. L., 115–124.
18. Mein, R. G., Laurenson, E. M., and McMahon, T. A., 1974. Simple non-linear model for flood estimation. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Engng, 100:1507–1518. (HY11)
19. Meyer, O. H., 1941. Simplified flood routing. J. Civ. Engng Div. ASCE, 11 (5):306–307.
20. Moore, R. J., 1985. The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basing scales. Hydrol. Sci. J., 30 (2):273–287.
21. Morel-Seytoux, H. J., 1993. “ Les modèles analytiques de surface. ”. In HYDROWAR Report # 93.9, Hydrology Days Publications, 57 Selby Lane, Atherton, California 94027, USA.
22. Nash, J. E., 1959. A note on the Muskingum flood routing method. J. Geophys. Res., 64:1053–1056.
23. Perumal, M., 1992a. The cause of negative initial outflow with the Muskingum method. Hydrol. Sci. J., 37 (4):391–402.
24. Perumal, M., 1992b. Multilinear Muskingum flood routing method. J. Hydrol., 133:259–272.
25. Pilgrim, D. H., 1976. Travel times and non-linearity of flood runoff from tracer measurements on a small watershed. Wat. Resour. Res., 12:487–496.
26. Ponce, V. M., and Theurer, F. D., 1982. Accuracy criteria in diffusion routing. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE, 108:747–757. (HY6)
27. Singh, V. P., and Scarlatos, P. D., 1987. Analysis of nonlinear Muskingum flood routing. J. Hydraul. Engng Div. ASCE, 113 (1):61–79.
28. Weinmann, P. E., and Laurenson, E. M., 1979. Approximate flood routing methods:A review. J. Hydraul. Engng Div. ASCE, 105 (12):1521–1535.