Focused supervision seen through a recursive frame analysis

Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 203-215

  Rudes, Jim ^a,d   Shilts, Lee ^b   Berg, Insoo Kim ^c  

^a Nova Southeastern University ^*

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Brief Family Therapy Center   (United States)

^d BARRY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FAMILY THERAPY; HUMAN;

FAMILY THERAPY; HUMANS;

EID: 0031110691     PISSN: 0194472X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00244.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amundson, J., Stewart, K., & Valentine, L. (1993). Temptations of power and certainty. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 111-123.
2. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27, 371-393.
3. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1990). Supervision as collaborative conversation: Questions and reflections. In H. Brandau (Ed.), Von der supervision zur systemischen vision (pp. 60-74). Salzburg, Austria: Otto Muller.
4. Atkinson, B. J. (1993). Hierarchy: The imbalance of risk. Family Process, 32, 167-170.
5. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
6. Berg, I. K., & Miller, S. (1992). Working with the problem drinker. New York: W. W. Norton.
7. Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26, 405-413.
8. Chenail, R. (1991a). Medical discourse and systemic frames of comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Chenail, R. (1991b). An introduction to recursive frame analysis. In M. J. McGee-Brown (Ed.), Diversity and design: Studying culture and the individual (pp. 374-381). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
10. Chenail, R. (1991c). Bradford Keeney's cybernetic project and the creation of recursive frame analysis. The Qualitative Report, 1(2/3), 7-14.
11. Chenail, R. J. (1995). Recursive frame analysis. The Qualitative Report 2 (2), 12-16.
12. Chenail, R. J., Douthit, P. E., Gale, J. E., Stormberg, J. L., Morris, G. H., Park, J. M., Sridaromont, S., & Schmer, V. (1990). "It's probably nothing serious, but...": Parents' interpretation of referral to pediatric cardiologists. Health Communication, 2(3), 165-187.
13. de Shazer, S. (1982). Patterns of brief family therapy. New York: Guilford.
14. de Shazer, S. (1988a). A requiem for power. Contemporary Family Therapy, 10(2), 69-76.
15. de Shazer, S. (1988b). Clues: Investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
16. de Shazer, S. (1991). Putting difference to work. New York: W. W. Norton.
17. de Shazer, S., & Berg, I. (1992). Doing therapy: A post-structural re-vision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 71-81.
18. Fortugno, L. (1991). Intersession break talk in supervision: A permeable frame analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
19. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Goldner, V. (1993). Power and hierarchy: Let's talk about it. Family Process, 32, 157-162.
21. Kay, P. (1979). The role of cognitive schemata in word meaning: Hedges revisited. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
22. Keeney, B. (1987). Recursive frame analysis: A method for organizing therapeutic discourse. Unpublished manuscript, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
23. Keeney, B. (1990). Improvisational therapy: A practical guide for creative clinical strategies. New York: Guilford.
24. Keeney, B., & Bobele, M. (1989). A brief note on family violence. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 10, 93-95.
25. Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
26. Liddle, H., Breunlin, D., & Schwartz, R. (Eds.). (1988). Handbook of family therapy training and supervision. New York: Guilford.
27. Marek, L. I., Sandifer, D. M., Beach, A., Concord, R. L., & Protinsky, H. D. (1994). Supervision without the problem: A model of solution-focused supervision. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 5, 57-64.
28. Margulies, A. (1989). The empathies imagination. New York: W. W. Norton.
29. Morris, G. H., & Chenail, R. J. (1995). The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Saba, G. W., & Liddle, H. A. (1986). Perceptions of professional needs, practice patterns, and critical issues facing family therapy trainers and supervisors. American Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 109-122.
31. Selekman, M. D., & Todd, T. C. (1995). Co-creating a context for change in the supervisory system: The solution-focused supervision model. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 14, 21-33.
32. Simon, G. M. (1993). Revisiting the notion of hierarchy. Family Process, 32, 147-155.
33. Thomas, F. N. (1994). Solution-oriented supervision: The coaxing of expertise. The Family Journal, 2, 11-18.