Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 232-235

  Coleman, Chris L ^a,b   Svec, Timothy A ^b  

^a Department of Endodontics ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NICKEL; RESIN; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; TIME; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; NICKEL; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STAINLESS STEEL; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 0031108338     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80053-2     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Weine FS, Kelley RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endodon 1975;1:255-62.
2. Lim KC, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J 1985;18:240-6.
3. Campos JM, del Rio C. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals. J Endodon 1990;16:230-4.
4. Coleman CL, Svec TA, Rieger MR, Suchina JA, Wang MM, Glickman GN. Analysis of Ni-Ti vs. stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging. J Endodon 1996:22;603-07.
5. Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endodon 1988;14:273-7.
6. Leseberg DA, Montgomery S. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration. J Endodon 1991;17:59-65.
7. Roig-Cayon M, Brau-Aguade E, Canalda-Sahli C, Moreno-Aguado V. A comparison of molar root canal preparations using Flexofile, Canal Master U, and Heliapical instruments. J Endodon 1994;20:495-9.
8. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine driven, and K-flex endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1995;21:146-51.
9. EI Deeb ME, Boraas JC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. Int Endod J 1985;18:1-7.
10. Briseno BM, Sonnabend E. The influence of different root canal instruments on root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Int Endod J 1991;24:15-23.