A comparison of dentine removal using safety or conventional Hedstrom files

Endodontics and Dental Traumatology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 65-68

  Lutnley, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crown down technique; Hedstrom files; Step back technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH ROOT;

DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTIN; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TOOTH APEX; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 0031108197     PISSN: 01092502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. SCHILDER H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin N Am 1974; 18: 269-96.
2. WEINE FS. Endodonlic therapy. 4 ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1989.
3. WEINE FS, KELLY RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J£n
4. TROXSTAD L. Clinical endodontics. 1st ed. New York: Thieme, 1991.
5. KESSLERJR, PETERS DD, LORTON L. Comparison of the rela-live risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1983; 9: 439-17.
6. ABOU-RASS M, FRANK AL, CLICK DH. The anticurvature method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 101: 792-4.
7. WALTON RE, TORABINEJAD M. Principles and practice ofendodontics. 1st ed. Saunders: Philadelphia, 1989.
8. BUCHANAN LS. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: COHEN S, BURNS RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1991, 166-92.
9. MONTGOMERY S. Root canal wall thickness of mandibular molars after biomechanical preparation. J Endod 1985; 11: 25763.
10. SNEIDER SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved canals. Oral Surg OralMed Oral Path 1971; 32: 2715.
11. BRAMANTE CM, BERBERT A, BORGES RP. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. J Endod 1987; 13: 243-5.