Myocardial revascularization with one or two internal mammary arteries. Comparison of long term results;Revascularización miocárdica con una y dos arterias mamarias: Resultados clínicos y seguimiento alejado

Revista Medica de Chile

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 391-401

  Morán V, Sergio ^a   Irarrázaval Ll, Manuel J ^a   Zalaquett S, Ricardo ^a   Villavicencio M, Mauricio ^b   Garayar P, Bernardita ^a   Muñoz C, Cecilia ^a   Maturana B, Gustavo ^a   Urzúa U, Jorge ^a   Lema F , Guillermo ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b Ayudante Alumno de la Esc de Med

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass; Coronary disease; Myocardial revascularization; Surgery, operative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DISEASE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERIES; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0031108017     PISSN: 00349887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. GALBUT DL, TRAAD EA, DORMAN MJ ET AL. Seventeen years experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 195-201.
2. CAMERON A, DAVIS KB, GREEN G ET AL. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic artery grafts-effects on survival over a 15 years period. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 216-9.
3. KLEIN LW, WEINTRAUB WS, AGARWAL JB ET AL. Pronostic significance of severe narrowing of the proximal portion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 42-6.
4. GRONDIN CM, CAMPEAU L, LESPERANCE J ET AL. Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation 1984; 70 (suppl I): I-208-I-212.
5. LYTTLE B, LOOP F, COSGROVE D ET AL. Long-term sequential studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 1983; 68 (III): 114-20.
6. LOOP FD, LYTTLE BW, COSGROVE DM ET AL. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery grafts on 10 years survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1-6.
7. NAUNHEIM KS, BARNER HB, FIORE AC ET AL. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Update. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53: 716-8.
8. BERREKLOUW E, SCHÖNBERGER JP, ERCAN H ET AL. Does it make sense to use two internal thoracic arteries? Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 1456-63.
9. MORAN S. Cirugía Coronaria. Análisis de 20 años de experiencia. Rev Chil Cir 1992; 44: 130-6.
10. YUSSUF S, ZUCKER D, PEDUZZI P ET AL. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10 years results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994; 344: 563-70.
11. OKIES JE, PAGE US, BIGELOW JC ET AL. The left internal thoracic artery: the graft of choice. Circulation. 1984; 70 (supp I): I-213-I-221.
12. FIORE AC, NAUNHEIM KS, DEAN P ET AL. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 202-9.
13. DEWAR LR, JAMIESON E, JANUZ MT ET AL. Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and eventfree performance. Circulation 1995; 92 (supl II): 8-13.
14. MORAN S, IRARRAZAVAL MJ, ZALAQUETT R ET AL. Revascularización miocárdica con arteria mamaria interna bilateral. Rev Chil Cardiol 1996; 15: 4-8.
15. MORAN S, LARRAIN E, BECKER P ET AL. Evolución de las indicaciones, técnica quirúrgica y resultados de la revascularización miocárdica. Rev Chil Cardiol 1993; 12: 13-7.
16. KOUCHOUKUS NT, WAREING TH, MURPHY SF ET AL. Risks of internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 210-9.
17. BERREKLOUW E, SCHÖNDERGER JP, BAVINCK JH ET AL. Similar hospital morbidity with the use of one or two internal thoracic arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 1564-72.
18. POCOCK SJ, HENDERSON RA, RICKANRDS AF ET AL. Meta-Analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet 1995, 346: 1184-89.
19. KING S, LEMBO N, WEINTRAUB W ET AL. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1044-50.
20. HAMM C, REIMERS J ISCHINGER T ET AL. A randomized study coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1037-43.