The social responsibilities of biological scientists

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 137-143

  Reiser, Stanley Joel ^a,c   Bulger, Ruth Ellen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Scientists; Social responsibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOMIC WARFARE; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; GENETICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONNEL; POLITICS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BIOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENETICS; HUMANS; NUCLEAR WARFARE; POLITICS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 0031107238     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-997-0004-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brown, G. E., Jr. (1993) The Mother of Necessity: Technology Policy and Social Equity. Presentation given at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Colloquium, Washington, DC, April 16.
2. Dismukes, K. (1979) What should society expect from scientists? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35 (9): 19-21.
3. Pigman, W. & Carmichael, E. B. (1950) An Ethical Code for Scientists. Science 111: 643-647.
4. Bethe, H. (1983) The Ethical Responsibilities of Scientists. Weapons Development Rather than Military Research Poses the Most Difficult Questions, The Center Magazine 16 (5): 2-5.
5. Bevan, W. (1977) Science in the Penultimate Age, American Scientist 65 (5): 538-546.
6. Atkinson, R. C. (1978) Rights and Responsibilities in Scientific Research, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 34 (10): 8-14.
7. Bulger, R. E. (1994) Toward a Statement of the Principles Underlying Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research, Academic Medicine 69 (2): 102-107.
8. Watson, J. D. (1990) The Human Genome Project: Past, Present, and Future, Science 248 (4951): 44-49.
9. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1994) Ethics of Scientific Research, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts.
10. Hippocratic Oath. (1977) In: Reiser, S. J., Dyck, A. J. & Curran, W. J., eds., Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
11. Reiser, S. J. (1994) The Ethics of Learning and Teaching Medicine, Academic Medicine 69: 872-876.
12. Geller, L N., Alper, J. S., Billings, P. R., Barash, C. I., Beckwith, J. & Natowicz, M. R. (1996) Individual, Family, and Societal Dimensions of Genetic Discrimination: A Case Study Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 71-88.
13. The Nuremberg Code, reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunal under Control Council Law, (1949) #10, Volume 2, Government Printing Office, Washington, D C.
14. DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services) (1995) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (revised). NIH Publication #86-23. DHHS, Washington, DC.
15. Berg, P., Baltimore, D., Brenner, S., Roblin, R. O, III & Singer, M. F. (1975) Summary statement of the Asilomar Conference on recombinant DNA moelcules, Science 188: 991.
16. Fredrickson, D. S. (1991) Asilomar and recombinant DNA: The end of the beginning. In: Hanna, K. E., ed., Biomedical Politics, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
17. National Institutes of Health, Guide to Grants and Contracts, (1989) Vol. 18, No. 45, December 22.