The ankle strategy for postural control - A comparison between a model-based and a marker-based method

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 165-173

  Karlsson, Annica ^a   Persson, Thomas ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ankle strategy; ground reaction force; inverted pendulum model; postural control

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ANKLE STRATEGY; GROUND REACTION FORCE; INVERTED PENDULUM MODEL; MARKER BASED METHOD; POSTURAL CONTROL;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

ANKLE; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER MODEL; INFORMATION PROCESSING;

ANKLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POSTURE;

EID: 0031106776     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2607(96)01794-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. [1] D. Manchester. M. Woollacott, N. Zederbauer-Hylton and O. Marin, Visual, vestibular, and somatosensory contributions to balance control in the older adult. J. Geronotol. Med. Sciences. 44 (1989) 118-127.
2. [2] H. Ring and J. Mizrahi, Biomechanical sway measurements in the evaluation of stroke patients. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2 (1992) 27-35.
3. [3] F.B. Horak, L.M. Nashner and H.C. Diener, Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp. Brain Res. 82 (1990) 167-177.
4. [4] G.G. Simoneau. J.S. Ulbrecht, J.A. Derr and P.R. Cavanagh. Role of somatosensory input to the control of human posture. Gait and Posture 3 (1995) 115-122.
5. [5] A. Shumway-Cook and F.B. Horak, Assessing the influence of sensory interaction on balance. Phys. Ther. 66 (1986) 1548-1550.
6. [6] D.A. Winter, A.B.C. of balance during standing and walking, Waterloo Biomechanics, 1993, pp. 58-15
7. [7] F. B. Horak and L.M. Nashner, Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J. Neurophysiol. 55 (1986) 1369-1381.
8. [8] M.A. Hughes, M.L. Schenkman, J.M. Chandler and S.A. Studenski, Postural responses to platform perturbation: kinematics and electromyography. Clin. Biomech. 10 (1995) 318-322.
9. [9] S.S. Hasan, D.W. Robin, D.C. Szurkus, D.H. Ashmead, S.W. Petersin and R.G. Shiavi, Simultaneous measurement of body centre of pressure and centre of gravity during upright stance. Part 1: Methods. Gait and Posture 4 (1996) 1-10.
10. [10] P.A. Goldie, T.M Bach and O.M. Evans, Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 70 (1989) 510-517.
11. [11] K.L. Clair and C.R. Raich, Postural stability measures: what to measure and for how long. Clin. Biomech. 11 (1996) 176-178.
12. [12] A. Karlsson and H. Lanshammar, Analysis of postural sway strategies using an inverted pendulum model and force plate data. Gait and Posture, accepted for publication.
13. [13] R.F. Chandler, C.E. Clausen, J.T. McConville, H.M. Reynolds and J.W. Young, Investigation of inertial properties of the human body, DOT HS-801, March 1975, pp. 430.
14. [14] A.V. Oppenheim and R.W. Schafer. Digital signal processing. Prentice Hall, Engelwook Cliffs. New Jersey, 1975, pp. 211-218.
15. [15] H. Lanshammar. On precision limits for derivatives numerically calculated from noisy data, J. Biomechanics, Vol. 15. No. 6, 1982, pp. 459-470.
16. [16] T. Söderström and P. Stoica, System Identification, Prentice Hall International, 1989, pp. 60-67.