Smectic compressibility of polymer-containing lyotropic lamellar phases: An experimental tool to study the thermodynamics of polymer confinement

Journal de Physique I

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 473-491

  Ligoure, C ^a,b   Bouglet, G ^a   Porte, G ^a   Diat O ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIBILITY OF LIQUIDS; DISPERSIONS; MACROMOLECULES; PHASE SEPARATION; PHASE TRANSITIONS; SMECTIC LIQUID CRYSTALS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; SWELLING;

BRINE SWOLLEN SURFACTANT LAMELLAR PHASE; MIXED AMPHIPHILIC SYSTEM; NEUTRAL WATER SOLUBLE NONADSORBING POLYMER;

LIQUID CRYSTAL POLYMERS;

EID: 0031096878     PISSN: 11554304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/jp2:1997139     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Porte G., J. Phys: Condens. Matter 4 (1992) 8649.
2. Farago B., Curr. Op. Colloid Interface Sei. l (1996) 17.
3. Ott A., Urbach W., Langevin D., Ober R. and Waks M., Europhys. Lett. 12 (1990) 395.
4. Fabre P., Casagrande C., Veyssié M., Cabuil V. and Massart R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 > (1990) 539;
5. Ponsinet V., Fabre P., Veyssié M. and Auvray L., J. Phys. II France 3 (1993) 1021.
6. Kekicheff P., Cabane B. and Rawiso M., J. Coll. Int. Sei. 102 (1984) 51.
7. Ligoure C., Bouglet G. and Porte G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3600.
8. Shing M., Ober R. and Kléman M., J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 11108.
9. Radlinska E.Z., Gulik-Krzywicki T., Lafuma F., Langevin D., Urbach W., Williams C.E. and Ober R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4237.
10. Ficheux M.-F., Bellocq A.-M. and Nallet F., J. Phys. II France 5 (1995) 823.
11. Illipoulos I. and Olsson U., J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 1500.
12. Dome B., Dubois M., Zemb T. and Cabanne B., J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 3828.
13. Nallet F., Roux D., Quilliet C., Fabre P. and Milner S.T., J. Phys. II France 4 (1994) 1477
14. Porte G., Marignan J., Bassereau P. and May R., J. Phys. France 38 (1984) 511.
15. Brooks J.T. and Gates M.E., J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 5464.
16. Caillé A., C. R. Acad. Sei. Paris B 274 (1972) 1733.
17. Günther L., Imry Y. and Lajzerowicz J., Phys. Rev. A 22 (1980) 1733.
18. Roux D. and Safinya C.R., J. Phys. France 49 (1988) 307.
19. Nallet F., Laversanne R. and Roux D., J. Phys. II France 3 (1993) 487.
20. Lei N., Safinya C.R. and Bruinsma R.F., J. Phys. II France 5 (1995) 425.
21. Zhang R., Suter RM. and Nagle J.F., Phys. Rev. E 50 (1994) 5047.
22. Brooks J.T., Marques C.M. and Gates M.E., J. Phys. II France l (1991) 673;
23. Brooks J.T., PHD Thesis, University of Cambridge (1992) unpublished.
24. Bouglet G., Bellocq A.M., Dufourc E. and Ligoure C., in preparation.
25. Daoud M. and de Gennes P.G., J. Phys. France 38 (1977) 85.
26. Bassereau P., Thèse de doctorat de l'Université Montpellier II (1990) unpublished.
27. The σ-characteristics may be relevant for some dynamic measurements, provided that the time scale of experimentation is smaller than the characteristics time of polymer diffusion through the membranes.
28. Joanny J.F., Leibler L. and de Gennes P.G., J. Polym. Sei., Polym. Phys. Ed. 17 (1979) 1073.
29. Helfrich W., Z. Naturforsch. A 33 (1978) 305.
30. Porte G. and Ligoure C., J. Chem. Phys. 102 (1995) 4290.
31. Fleer G., Cohen Stuart M.A., Scheutjens J.M.H.M., Cosgrove T. and Vincent B., Polymers at interfaces (Chapman & Hall Editions, 1993).
32. In fact the additivity of the van der Waals and undulation terms in equation (17) is not realy correct: see Milner S.T. and Roux D., J. Phys. II France 2 (1992) 1741. On the contrary, the additivity of the electrostatic term and the undulation term, as well as the additivity of the polymer-mediated term and the undulation term are correct (Didier Roux, private communication and Ref. [14]). However, in the present case, this delicate question is not really relevant, since the van der Waals interaction can be neglected.
33. Dubois M., Zemb T., Belloni L., Delville A., Levitz P. and Setton R., J. Chem. Phys. 96 (1992).
34. Porcar L., Ligoure C. and Marignan J., J. Phys. II France 7 (1997) 493.
35. Meza R. and Gargallo L., Europ. Polym. J. 13 (1977) 235.
36. Hayakawa K. and Kwak J.T.C., Cationic surfactants, D.N. Rubingh and P.M. Holland, Eds. (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1991) p. 189.
37. Bösecke P., Diat O. and Rasmussen B., Rev. Sei. Instrum. 66 (1995) 1636.
38. Note that for very high polymer concentration (> 10%), the solution cannot be viewed as a semi-dilute solution of polymer; it is rather a concentrated solution, for which we did not calculate the polymer contribution to the layer compression modulus.
39. Porte G., Marignan J., Bassereau P. and May R., Europhys. Lett. 7 (1988) 713;
40. Nallet F., Roux D. and Milner S.T., J. Phys. France 51 (1990) 2333.
41. Kurata M. and Stockmayer M., Fortschr. Hochpolym. Forsch. 3 (1963) 196.
42. Shing M. and Klernan M., C. R. Acad. Sei. Paris Série II318 (1994) 887.