Longitudinal Changes in Consensus as a Function of Acquaintance and Agreement in Liking

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 604-616

  Park, Bernadette ^a   Kraus, Sue ^a   Ryan, Carey S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b University of Colorado ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMOTION; EXTRAVERSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMOTIONS; EXTRAVERSION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031093034     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.604     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albright, L. (1990). A longitudinal study of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. Unpublished raw data, Westfield State College, Westfield, MA.
2. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387-395.
3. Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.
4. Bourne, E. (1977). Can we describe an individual's personality? Agreement on stereotype versus individual attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 863-872.
5. Cloyd, L. (1977). Effect of acquaintanceship on accuracy of person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 819-826.
6. Colvin, C. R., & Funder, D. C. (1991). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 884-894.
7. Donahue, E. M. (1994). Do children use the Big Five, too? Content and structural form in personality description. Journal of Personality, 62, 45-66.
8. Dornbusch, S. M., Hastorf, A. H., Richardson, S. A., Muzzy, R. E., & Vreeland, R. S. (1965). The perceiver and the perceived: Their relative influence on categories of interpersonal cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 434-440.
9. Flink, C., & Park, B. (1991). Increasing consensus in trait judgments through outcome dependency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 453-467.
10. Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
11. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
12. Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656-672.
13. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
14. Jackson, D. N., Neill, J. A., & Bevan, A. R. (1973). An evaluation of forced-choice and true-false item formats in personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 21-30.
15. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big-Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in natural languages and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford Press.
16. John, O. P., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (1991). The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies: Studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 348-361.
17. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
18. Kenny, D. A. (1983). SOREMO: A FORTRAN program for round-robin data structures. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
19. Kenny, D. A. (1991). A general model of consensus in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 98, 155-163.
20. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis, New York: Guilford Press.
21. Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245-258.
22. Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1990). [Applicant-interviewer study]. Unpublished raw data. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
23. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141-182). New York: Academic Press.
24. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
25. Malloy, T. E., & Albright, L. (1990). Interpersonal perception in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 419-428.
26. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
27. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
28. Park, B. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 907-917.
29. Park, B., DeKay, M. L., & Kraus, S. (1994). Aggregating social behavior into person models: Perceiver-induced consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 437-459.
30. Park, B., & Flink, C. (1989). A social relations analysis of agreement in liking judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 506-518.
31. Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1989). Agreement on initial impressions: Differences due to perceivers, trait dimensions, and target behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 493-505.
32. Park, B., & Kraus, S. (1992). Consensus in initial impressions as a function of verbal information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 439-446.
33. Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
34. Paulhus, D. L., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: Highlighting the person in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1233-1242.
35. Paunonen, S. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833.
36. Taft, R. (1966). Accuracy of empathic judgments of acquaintances and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 600-604.
37. Watson, D. (1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120-128.
38. Weiss, D. S. (1979). The effects of systematic variations in information on judges' descriptions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2121-2136.