Toward a History of Research in Nursing

Nursing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 105-110

  D'Antonio, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING RESEARCH; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

FEMALE; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); NURSING RESEARCH; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 0031092928     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199703000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ADAMS, M. (1986). Aging: Gerontological nursing research. In H. H. Werley, J. J. Fitzpatrick, & R. L. Tauton (Eds.), Annual Review of Nursing Research (Vol. 4, pp. 77-103). New York: Springer.
2. AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION (1962). ANA blueprint for research in nursing. American Journal of Nursing, 62(8), 69-71.
3. APPLEBY, J., HUNT, L., & JACOB, M. (1994). Telling the truth about history. New York: Norton.
4. ARMENY, S. (1983). Organized nurses, women philanthropists, and the intellectual bases for cooperation among women, 1898-1920. In E. C. Lageman (Ed.), Nursing history: New perspectives, new possibilities (pp. 13-46). New York: Teachers College Press.
5. ASHLEY, J. H. (1975). Nursing and early feminism. American Journal of Nursing, 75, 1465-1467.
6. BAER, E. D. (1987). A cooperative venture in pursuit of professional status: A research journal for nursing. Nursing Research, 36, 18-25.
7. BARINAGA, M. (1993). Is there a female style in science? Science, 260, 384-391.
8. BATEY, M. V. (1985). Nursing research productivity: The University of Washington experience. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 7, 489-193.
9. DASTON, L. (1995). The moral economy of science. Osiris, 10, 1-6.
10. DOLAN, J. A. (1973). Nursing in society: A historical perspective. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
11. DOWNS, F. S. (1996). On clinical interpretations of research findings. Nursing Research, 45, 195.
12. EVANS, M. N. (1991). Fits and starts: A genealogy of hysteria in early modern France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13. FLECK, L. (1979). The genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. FORMAN, P. (1991). Independence, not transcendence, for the historian of science. Isis, 82, 71-76.
15. FOX KELLER, E. (1985). Reflections of gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. GOLINSKI, J. (1990). The theory of practice and the practice of theory: Sociological approaches in the history of science. Isis, 81, 492-505.
17. GORTNER, S. R. (1973). Research in nursing: The federal interest and grant program. American Journal of Nursing, 73, 347-350.
18. GORTNER, S. R., & NAHM, H. (1977). An overview of nursing research in the United States. Nursing Research, 26, 10-33.
19. HAMILTON, D. (1994). Constructing the mind of nursing. Nursing History Review, 2, 3-28.
20. HIGGINBOTHAM, E. B. (1993). Righteous discontent: The women's movement and the black Baptist church, 1880-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. HINSHAW, A. S. (1992). Nursing research: Weaving the past, the present and the future. In L. Aiken & C. Fagin (Eds.), Charting nursing's future: Agenda for the nineties (pp. 485-503). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
22. JORDANOVA, L. (1993). Gender and the historiography of science. British Journal of the History of Science, 26, 469-483.
23. KALISH, P. A., & KALISH, B. J. (1978). The advance of American nursing. Boston: Little, Brown.
24. KIDD, P., & MORRISON, E. F. (1988). The progression of knowledge in nursing: A search for meaning. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 20, 222-224.
25. KOHLSTEDT, S. G. (1995). Women in the history of science: An ambiguous place. Osiris 10, 39-60.
26. LEDERER, S. E. (1992). Political animals: The shaping of bio-medical research literature in twentieth century America. Isis, 83, 61-79.
27. LONGINO, H. (1991). Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. LONGINO, H., & DOELL, R. (1983). Body, bias and behavior: A comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9, 206-227.
29. MARSDEN, C., & OMERY, A. (1992). Women, science and a women's science. Women's Studies, 21, 479-489.
30. MAY, K. M., & SHERMAN, J. B. (1990). The history of research in public health nursing education (pp. 147-178). National League for Nursing Publication no. 15-2339.
31. MCGAW, J. M. (1988). No passive victims, no separate spheres: A feminist perspective on technology's history. In S. H. Cuttliffe & R. W. Post (Eds.), In context: Essays in the history of technology in honor of Melvin Kranzberg (pp. 172-191). Easton, PA: Lehigh University Press.
32. MOODY, L. E., WILSON, M. E., SMYTH, K., SCHWARTZ, R., TITTLE, M., & VAN COTT, M. L. (1988). Analysis of a decade of nursing research practice: 1977-1986. Nursing Research, 37, 374-379.
33. MORANTZ, R. M. (1982). Feminism, professionalism, and germs: The thought of Mary Putnam Jacobi and Elizabeth Blackwell. American Quarterly, 32, 466-479.
34. MORANTZ, R. M. (1985). Sympathy and science: Women physicians in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. REVERBY, S. (1989). A legitimate relationship: Nursing, hospitals and science in the twentieth century. In D. E. Long & J. Golden (Eds.), The American general hospital: Communities and social context (pp. 135-156). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36. ROBERTS, S. J. (1983). Oppressed group behavior: Implications for nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 5(4), 21-30.
37. ROSE, H. (1983). Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs: Journal Women in Culture and Society, 9(11), 73-90.
38. ROSENBERG, C. E. (1983). Science in American society: A generation of historical debate. Isis, 74, 356-367.
39. ROSENBERG, C. E. (1996). Science from below: The next generation. In R. L. Numbers & C. E. Rosenberg (Eds.), The scientific enterprise in America: Readings from ISIS (pp. 15-20). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. ROSSITER, M. W. (1984). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. SARNECKY, M. T. (1993a). Inventing nursing research. Nursing Research, 42, 318-319.
42. SARNECKY, M. T. (1993b). Julia Catherine Stimson: Nurse and feminist. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 113-120.
43. SCOTT, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91, 1053-1075.
44. SILVA, M. L., & ROTHBART, D. (1984). An analysis of changing trends in philosophies of science on nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 6(2), 1-13.
45. SOLOMON, B. M. (1985). In the company of educated women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. STEVENSON J. S. (1987). Forging a research discipline. Nursing Research, 36, 60-64.
47. TAYLOR, S. D. (1975). Bibliography on nursing research, 1950-1974. Nursing Research, 24, 207-225.
48. TEMKIN, E. (1994). Turn-of-the-century nursing perspectives on venereal disease. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(2), 207-212.
49. THOMPSON, J. L. (1983). Practical discourse in nursing: Going beyond empiricism and historicism. Advances in Nursing Science, 7(4), 59-71.