Implications of Nursing Taxonomies for Middle-Range Theory Development

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 37-49

  Blegen, Mary A ^b   Tripp Reimer, Toni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Middle range theory; Nursing taxonomies; Nursing theories

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING CARE; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REVIEW;

HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING CARE; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING;

EID: 0031092681     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00012272-199703000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blegen MA, Tripp-Reimer T. The nursing theory-nursing research connection. In McCloskey JC, Grace HK, eds. Current Issues in Nursing. 3rd ed. London, England: Blackwell; 1994.
2. Blegen MA, Tripp-Reimer T. Nursing theory, nursing research, and nursing practice: Connected or separate? In McCloskey JC, Grace HK, eds. Current Issues in Nursing (4th ed). London, England: Blackwell, in press.
3. Levine ME. The rhetoric of nursing theory. Image J Nurs Schol. 1995;27(1)11-14.
4. Yura H, Torres G. Today's conceptual frameworks within baccalaureate nursing programs. In Torres G, Yura H, eds. Faculty-Curriculum Development: Part III. Conceptual Framework: Its Meaning and Function. New York, NY: National League for Nursing; 1975.
5. Fawcett J. The relationship between theory and research: a double helix. ANS. 1978;1(1):49-62.
6. Flaskerud JH, Halloran EJ. Areas of agreement in nursing theory development. ANS. 1980;3(1):1-7.
7. Newman MA. The continuing revolution: a history of nursing science. In Chaska NL, ed. The Nursing Profession: A Time to Speak. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1984.
8. Tripp-Reimer T, Woodworth G. The dimensional structure of nursing interventions. Nurs Res. 1996;45(1):10-17.
9. Moody LE, Wilson ME. Analysis of a decade of nursing practice research: 1977-1986. Nurs Res. 1988; 37(6):374-379.
10. Silva MC. Research testing nursing theories. ANS. 1986;9(1):1-11.
11. Acton GJ, Irvin BL. Theory testing research: building the science. ANS. 1991;14(1):52-61.
12. Lenz ER, Suppe F. Collaborative development of middle-range nursing theories: toward a theory of unpleasant symptoms. ANS. 1995;17(3):1-13.
13. Jacox A. Theory construction in nursing: an overview. Nurs Res. 1974;23(1):4-13.
14. Merton RK. On Theoretical Sociology. New York, NY: Free Press; 1967.
15. Hardy ME. Perspectives on nursing theory. ANS. 1978; 1(1):27-48.
16. Dickoff J, James P. Theory in a practice discipline: part I. Practice oriented theory. Nurs Res. 1968;17(5):415-435.
17. Kim HS. Putting theory into practice: problems and prospects. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(22):1632-1639.
18. Weiss SJ. Contemporary empiricism. In Omery A, Kasper C, eds. In Search of Nursing Science. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1995.
19. Walker IO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1983.
20. Walker IO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 2nd ed. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1988.
21. Rodgers BL, Knafl KA. Concept Development in Nursing. Philadelphia, Penn: W.B. Saunders; 1993.
22. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby: 1996.
23. Iowa Outcomes Team; Johnson M, Maas M, eds. Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes Classification (NOC). St. Louis, Mo: Mosby YearBook; in press.
24. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. NANDA Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification 1995-1996. Philadelphia, Pa: North American Nursing Diagnosis Association.
25. Dubin R. Theory Building. New York, NY: Free Press; 1978.
26. Stinchcombe AL. Constructing Social Theories. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World; 1968.
27. Bailey KD. Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
28. Fitzpatrick JJ. Conceptual basis for the organization and advancement of nursing knowledge: nursing diagnosis/taxonomy. Nurs Diagnosis. 1990;1(3):102-106.
29. Aydelotte MK, Peterson KH. Key note address: nursing taxonomies - state of the art. In: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference. Philadelphia, Pa: North American Nursing Diagnosis Association;
30. Pinkley CL. Exploring NANDA's definition of nursing diagnosis: linking diagnostic judgments with the selection of outcomes and interventions. Nurs Diagnosis. 1991;2(1):26-32.
31. Wooldridge JB, Brown OF. Nursing diagnosis: the central theme in nursing knowledge. Nurs Diagnosis. 1993;4(2):50-55.
32. Craft-Rosenberg M. Nursing Diagnosis Extension and Classification (NDEC). Grant proposal submitted to National Institutes of Health, October 1, 1995.
33. Maas M, Johnson M. Conceptual and methodological issues and strategies in classifying nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Image J Nurs Schol. In press.
34. Gordon M. Toward theory-based diagnostic categories. Nurs Diagnosis. 1990;1(1):5-11.