Simulating electricity restructuring in California: Interactions with the regional market

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 3-28

  Kahn, Edward ^a   Bailey, Shawn ^b   Pando, Luis ^c  

^a NERA ECONOMIC CONSULTING   (United States)

^b Southern California Gas Company   (United States)

^c Henwood Energy Services Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; REGIONAL PLANNING;

ELECTRICITY RESTRUCTURING; MULTIAREA CHRONOLOGICAL PRODUCTION SIMULATION MODEL;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL RESTRUCTURING; MARKET INTERACTION; POWER EXCHANGE; REGIONAL MARKET;

USA, CALIFORNIA;

EID: 0031089272     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00008-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baldick, R., 1995. The generalized unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 10 (1), 465-473.
2. CGEU, 1995. California Gas Report Supplement. California Gas and Electric Utilities.
3. CPUC, 1994. Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Proposed Policies Governing Restructuring California's Electric Services Industry and Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission's Proposed Policies Governing Restructuring California's Electric Services Industry and Reforming Regulation. R.94-04-031 and I.94-04-32, California Public Utilities Commission.
4. CPUC, 1995a. Proposed Policy Decision Adopting a Preferred Industry Structure. R.94-04-031 and I.94-04-32, California Public Utilities Commission.
5. CPUC, 1995b. Decision 95-12-063 as modified by D.96-01-009. California Public Utilities Commission.
6. Chao, H., Peck, S., 1995. Market mechanisms for electric power transmission. Working Paper, Electric Power Research Institute.
7. CUE, 1995. Comments on the Proposed Policy Decision Adopting a Preferred Industry Structure and the Proposal and Recommendations of Commissioner Jessie Knight Jr. R.94-04-031 and I.94-04-32, Coalition of California Utility Employees.
8. Comnes, G., Beiden, T., Kahn, E., 1995. The price of electricity from private power producers, stage II: Expansion of sample and preliminary statistical analysis. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. LBL-36054.
9. Decision Focus Inc., 1990. The effects of new transmission versus other alternatives in meeting California electricity demands, phase II. California Energy Commission.
10. Dixit, A., Pindyck, R., 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
11. Fessler, D., 1994. Concurring Opinion in California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Proposed Policies Governing Restructuring California's Electric Services Industry and Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission's Proposed Policies Governing Restructuring California's Electric Services Industry and Reforming Regulation. R.94-04-031 and I.94-04-32.
12. Garber, D., Hogan, W., Ruff, L., 1994. An efficient electricity market: Using a pool to support real competition. The Electricity Journal 7 (7), 48-60.
13. Gilbert, R., Kahn, E., White, M., 1993. Coordination in the wholesale market: Where does it work? The Electricity Journal 6 (8), 51-59.
14. Hogan, W., 1993. Markets in real electric networks require reactive prices. The Energy Journal 14 (3), 171-200.
15. House, L., 1985. Minimum oil and gas generation levels in California utilities. California Energy Commission.
16. Jackups, R., Raga, J., Le, K., Day, J., 1988. A two-year assessment of the computerized operational-planning program at Cincinnati Gas and Electric. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 3 (4), 1840-1846.
17. Johnson, R., Oren, S., Swoboda, A., 1996. Equity and efficiency of unit commitment in competitive electricity markets. Working Paper PWP-39, University of California.
18. Joskow, P., 1995. Restructuring and regulatory reform in network Industries: From hierarchies to markets. MIT mimeo.
19. Kahn, E., 1995. Regulation by simulation: The role of production cost models in electricity planning and pricing. Operations Research 43 (3), 388-398.
20. Kahn, E., 1977. An assessment of the potential for full coordination of the California electric utilities. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA LBL-5941.
21. Kahn, E., Baldick, R., 1994. Reactive power is a cheap constraint. The Energy Journal 15 (4), 191-201.
22. Kahn, E., Marnay, C., Berman, D., 1992. Evaluating dispatchability features in competitive bidding. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 7 (3), 1259-1265.
23. LCG Consulting, 1996. Presentation to the California Energy Commission, February 5, 1996.
24. Lee, F., Feng, Q., 1992. Multi-area unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 7 (2), 591-599.
25. Lee, R., Beshir, M., Finley, A., Hayes, D., Hsu, J., Peterson, H., DeShazo, G., Gerlach, W., 1995. Application of static VAR compensators for the dynamic performance of the Mead-Adelanto and the Mead-Phoenix Transmission Projects. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 10 (1), 459-466.
26. Lee, S., 1993. Comparison of planning codes for energy storage evaluation. EPRI Rep. TR-101648.
27. Lucas, N., Taylor, P., 1995. The strategy curve: A method for representing and interpreting generator bidding strategies. Utilities Policy 5 (1), 75-80.
28. Miller, S. Korosec, S., 1994. Final adopted staff forecast of non-utility supplies: Supply Form R-4 Format, CEC Docket No. 93-ER-94.
29. Newbery, D., 1995. Power markets and market power. The Energy Journal 16 (3), 39-67.
30. NYPSC, 1991. Report on the management and operations audit of the New York power pool. New York Public Service Commission.
31. Pando, L., 1995. Testimony and workpapers in Southern California Gas Company. CPUC Application No. 95-06-002.
32. Papalexopoulos, A., Hao, S., Liu, E., Alaywan, Z., Kato, K., 1994. Cost/benefit analysis of an optimal power flow: The PG&E experience. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 9 (2), 796-804.
33. Papalexopoulos, A., 1996. Challenges to an on-line OPF implementation, optimal power flow: Solution techniques, requirements, and challenges. IEEE Tutorial 96 TP 111-0, pp. 36-51.
34. Perl, L., 1996. Measuring market power in electric generation. Antitrust Law Journal 64 (2), 311-321.
35. Ruganis, P., 1986. Estimation of historical New York power pool marginal energy costs. Rochester Gas and Electric.
36. Scully, A., Harpur, A., Le, K., Day, J., Malone, M., Mousseau, T., 1992. Using a semi-guided Monte Carlo method for faster simulation of forced outages of generating units. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 7 (3), 1313-1321.
37. Sheble, G., Fahd, G., 1994. Unit commitment literature synopsis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 9 (1), 128-135.
38. Simons, N., Garver, L., Mukerji, R., 1993. Transmission constrained production costing: As key to pricing transmission access. Public Utilities Fortnightly.
39. Stoll, H., 1989. Least Cost Electric Utility Planning. John Wiley and Sons.
40. The Simulation Group, 1995. PROSYM chronological production modeling system. The Simulation Group, Sacramento, CA.
41. Walton, S., Tabors, R., 1996. Zonal transmission pricing: A methodology and preliminary results from the WSCC.
42. WSCC, 1995. Coordinated bulk power supply program. Rep. OE-411, Western Systems Coordinating Council, Salt Lake City.
43. White, M., 1995. Valuing market trading mechanisms: Evidence from electricity markets. Working Paper PWP-33, University of California.
44. Wu, F., Varaiya, P., Spiller, P., Oren, S., 1994. Folk theorems on transmission access: Proofs and counter examples. Working Paper PWP-023, University of California Energy Institute.
45. Wu, F., Varaiya, P., 1995. Coordinated multilateral trades for electric power networks: theory and implementation. Working Paper PWP-031, University of California Energy Institute.