Electricity restructuring and regional air pollution

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 139-174

  Palmer, Karen ^a   Burtraw, Dallas ^a  

^a RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Electricity restructuring; Transmission

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY RESTRUCTURING;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPETITION; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH RISKS; MARKETING; NITROGEN OXIDES; REGIONAL PLANNING;

ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION;

AIR POLLUTION; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL RESTRUCTURING; POLLUTION IMPACT; REGIONAL PATTERN;

USA;

EID: 0031087001     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(97)00002-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berkman, M., Griffes, P.H., 1995. Environmental policy and utility deregulation. Paper presented at the Fourteenth Annual Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Public Utility Economics, 25 May.
2. x Emissions Standards on Electric Generation Facilities in the ECAR Region. Tellus Institute, Boston.
3. Biewald, B., 1997. Competition and clean air: the operating economics of electricity generation, Electricity Journal, 10 (1) (January/February): 41-53.
4. Bohi, D.R., Palmer, K.L., 1996. Relative efficiency benefits of wholesale and retail competition in electricity: an analysis and a research agenda. Report to the National Renewable Energy Lab., March.
5. Bohi, D.R., Zimmerman, M.B., 1984. An update on econometric studies of energy demand behavior. Annual Review of Energy 9, 105-154.
6. Center for Clean Air Policy, 1996a. Comments of the Center for Clean Air Policy on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Open Access for Transmission Service, February. Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC.
7. Center for Clean Air Policy, 1996b. Emission impacts of increased energy exports from the American Electric Power (AEP) System. Draft Discussion Paper, 2 February, Washington, DC.
8. Center for Clean Air Policy, 1996c. Emissions impacts of competition: further analysis in consideration of Putnam, Hayes and Bartlett, Inc.'s critique. Report, 17 June, Washington, DC.
9. Douglas, J., 1994. The challenges of open access. EPRI Journal September, 6-15.
10. Kerber, R., Holden, B.A., 1996. Power struggle: deregulation sparks marketing battle. Wall Street Journal May 13, B1.
11. Lee, H., Darani, N., 1995. Electricity restructuring and the environment. CSIA Discussion Paper 95-13, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, December.
12. North American Electricity Reliability Council (NERC), 1995a. 1995/96 Winter Assessment.
13. North American Electricity Reliability Council (NERC), 1995b. 1995 summer assessment.
14. North American Electricity Reliability Council (NERC), 1995c. Electricity supply and demand.
15. Putnam, Hayes, Bartlett, 1996. Review of Center for Clean Air Policy's paper entitled: "Emission impacts of increased energy exports from the American Electric Power (AEP) System." Report prepared form the American Electric Power System, April 12.
16. Rosen, R., Woolf, T., Dougherty, B., Biewald, B., Bernow, S., Regulatory Assistance Project, 1995. Promoting Environmental Quality in a Restructured Electric Industry. Prepared for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Tellus Institute, Boston, December 15.
17. Shannon, J.D., Voldner, E.C., 1992. Deposition of S and NOx nitrogen to the Great Lakes estimated with a regional deposition model. Environmental Science and Technology 26, 970-978.
18. Shannon, J.D., Camp, J., Trexler, E.C., Jr., 1996. Effects of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments on distributions of visual impairment. In: Proceedings of the 9th Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with A and WMA, 28 January-2 February 1996, Atlanta, GA. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp. 570-574.
19. US Energy Information Administration (EIA), 1993. Electric plant cost and power production data 1991. Final Issue, Department of Energy, May.
20. US Energy Information Administration (EIA), 1995a. Electric Power Annual 1994, vol. I. Department of Energy.
21. US Energy Information Administration (EIA), 1995b. Electric Power Annual 1994, vol. II (Operational and Financial Data). Department of Energy.
22. US Energy Information Administration (EIA), 1996. An analysis of FERC's final environmental impact statement for electricity open access and recovery of stranded cost. Prepared for Senator James Jeffords, Vice Chair, Subcommittee on Energy Production and Regulation, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, US Senate, September.
23. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1996a. Aerometric information retrieval system. April.
24. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1996b. Comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement. February.
25. US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), 1996a. Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities (RM95-8-000) and Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities (RM94-7-001), FERC/EIS-0096 Washington, DC, April.
26. US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), 1996b. Environmental Impact Statement, Promoting Wholesale Competition through Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities and Recovery of Stranded Cost by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities. April.
27. US National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP), 1996. Tracking and analysis framework: interactive model for integrated assessment of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments.