Effects of Attachment Clips on Occlusal Force Transmission in Removable Implant-Supported Overdentures and Cantilevered Superstructures

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 228-236

  Kayacan, Ramazan ^a   Ballarini, Roberto ^a   Mullen, Robert L ^a   Wang, Russell R ^b  

^a Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attachment clip; Beam theory; Cantilevered superstructure; Force distribution; Moment distribution; Removable implant supported overdenture

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; PALLADIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BITE FORCE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE PRECISION ATTACHMENT; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE; DENTURE, OVERLAY; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PALLADIUM; PLIABILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0031086488     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Julius R. Overdenture treatment with the Brånemark implant. In: Albrektsson T, Zarb GA (eds). The Brånemark Osseointegrated Implant. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:215-220.
2. Schnitman PA. Implant dentistry: Where are we now? J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124(4):39-47.
3. Timoshenko SP, Gere JM. Mechanics of Materials. New York: Van Nostrand. 1972.
4. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. J Oral Rehab 1989;21:47-50.
5. Saadoun AP, LeGall ML. Clinical results and guidelines on Steri-Oss endosseous implants. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:480-499.
6. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-848.
7. Osier JF. Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:40-47.
8. Bidez MW, Chen Y, McLoughlin SW, English CE. Finite element analysis of four-abutment hader bar designs. Implant Dent 1993;2:171-176.
9. Hertel RC, Kalk W. Influence of the dimensions of implant superstructure on peri-implant bone loss. Int J Prosthod 1993;6:18-24.
10. Albrektsson T, Johansson CB, Sennerby L. Biological aspects of implant dentistry: Osseointegration. Periodontology 2000 1994;4:58-73.
11. Pilliar RM, Davies JK, Smith DC. The bone-biomaterial interface for load-bearing implants. MRS Bulletin 1991;16(9): 55-61.
12. Lautenschlager EP, Monaghan P. Titanium and titanium alloys as denial materials. Int Dent J 1993;43:245-253.
13. Bidez MW, Chen Y, McLoughlin SW, English CE. Finite element analysis (FEA) studies in 2.5 mm round bar design: The effects of bar length and material composition on bar failure. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:122-128.
14. O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials: Properties and Selection. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989.
15. Logan DL. A First Course in the Finite Element Method, ed 2. Boston: PWS-KENT, 1992.
16. Richter E-J. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic: dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:602-609.
17. Richter E-J, Orschall B, Jovanovic SA. Dental implant abutment resembling the two-phase tooth mobility. J Biomechanics 1990;23:297-306.
18. Komiyama Y. Clinical and research experiences with osseointegrated implants in Japan. In: Albrektsson T, Zarb GA (eds). The Bråuemark Osseointegrated Implant. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:197-214.
19. DuBois JH, John FW. Plastics, ed 5. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1974.
20. Roark RJ, Young WC. Formulas for Stress and Strain, ed 5. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
21. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: Basic: concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:264-273.