Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer / glass cermet partial tunnel restorations

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 241-246

  Prabhu, Neeta T ^a   Munshi, A K ^a   Shetty, Tilak Raj ^b  

^a A B SHETTY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b BANGALORE UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; CHELON SILVER; FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; SILVER DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP;

BICUSPID; CERMET CEMENTS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); SILVER COMPOUNDS; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 0031083146     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jinks GM. Fuoride impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 30: 87-92, 1963.
2. Jinks GM. Personal Communication, Feb. 1987.
3. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J 132: 133, 1972.
4. Sigurjons H. Extension for precention: historical developmentand current status of Dr. GV Black's concept. Oper Dent 8: 57-63, 1983.
5. Knight G. The tunnel restrations. Dent Outlook 10: 53-77, 1984.
6. Hunt PR. A modified Class II cavity preparation for glassionomer restorative materisals. Quintessence Int 10: 1011-1018, 1984.
7. Hunt PR. Micro conservative restorations for approximal carious lesions. JADA 120: 37-44, 1990.
8. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: a long term pilot study over a minum of five years. J Dent 23: 213-5, 1995.
9. Purk JH, Roberts RS, Elledge DA, Chappell RP, Eick JD. Marginal ridge strength of class II tunnel restorations. Am J Dent 8: 75-9, 1995.
10. Ehrilick J, Yaffle A. A modified cavity preparation for restoring interproximal caries. Compend Contin Ed Dent 8: 62-65, 1987.
11. Ramos de Freitas AR, et al. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars. Quintessence Int 25: 419-424, 1994.
12. Walls AWG, Adamson J, McCabe JF, Murray JJ. The properties of a glass ionomer cement incorporating sintered metallic particles. Dent Mat 3: 113-116, 1987.
13. Alperstein KS, Graver HT, Herold R. Marginal leakage of glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Prosthet Dent 50: 803-807, 1988.
14. Mount J. Minimal treatment of the carious lesion. Int Dent J 41: 55-59, 1989.
15. Mount GJ. Glass ionomer cements; Past, present and future. Oper Dent 18: 82-90, 1994.
16. Ravindra P, Hegde A, Munshi AK. Laser and light cured composite resin restorations. In vitro comparison of isotope and dye penetration. J Clin Ped Dent 20: 213-218, 1996.
17. Plant CB, Jones DW. The damaging effects of restorative materials. Br Dent J 136: 269, 1976.
18. Rajmohan Shetty Y, Munshi AK. In vitro comparison of the-marginal ridge fracture resistance and microleakage between glass ionomer and glass cermet tunnel restorations. J Clin Ped Dent 21, 1996.
19. Hill FJ, Halaseh FJ. A Laboratory investigation of tunnel restorations in premolar teeth. Br Dent J 165: 364-367, 1988.
20. Fasbinder DJ, Davis RD, Burgess JD. Strength of the undermined marginal ridge in tunnel restorations. J Dent Res 64 (Special issue) 1985.
21. Hasselrot L. Tunnel prepartions, traditional and alternative methods. Tandlakartidiningen 82: 1114-1126, 1990.
22. Papa J, Christopher C, Messer HH, Wilcon PR. Tunnel restorations versus class II restorations for small proximal lesions. A comparison of tooth strengths. Quint Int 24: 93-98, 1993.
23. Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations: a 3 1/2 year follow-up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth. Swedish Dental J 17: 173-82, 1993.
24. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH, Wilson PR. Tunnel restorations versus class II restorations for small proximal lesions: a comparison of tooth strengths. Quintessence Intern 24: 93-8, 1993.
25. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Efficacy of tunnel restorations in the removal of caries. Quintessence Intern 24: 715-9, 1993.
26. Crisps S, Lewis B, Wilson AD. Characterization of glass ionomer cements part I. Longterm hardness and compressive strength. J Dent Res 4: 162-166, 1976.
27. Wilson AD. Development is glass ionomer cements. Int J Proth 2: 1989.
28. Hembree JH, Andrews J T. Marginal leakage of anterior restorative materials. A five year study. J Tenn D A 64: 28-30, 1984.
29. Baez RJ, Weed RM, Morales F. Microleakage of glass ionomer-restorations. J Dent Res 63: 294, 1984.
30. Robbins J.W, Robert L.C. Microleakage of ketac silver in tunnel preparation. Oper Dent 13: 8-11, 1988.
31. Thronton B, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Fluoride release and tensile bond strength of ketac fil and ketac silver to enamel and dentin Dent Mat 12: 241-245, 1986.
32. Tobias R S, Browne R M, Plant C G, Ingram DV. Pulpal response to glass ionomer cements. Br Dent J 144: 345-350, 1978.
33. Cornelis H, Pameijer, Seagal E, Richardson J. Pulpal response to glass ionomer cements in primates. J Prosth Dent 46: 36-40, 1981.
34. Kawahara Haruyuki, Yoshitsugu M. Biological evaluation of glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 58: 1080-1086, 1979.