|
Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 165-184
|
"There is no evidence to suggest...": changing the way we judge information for disclosure in the informed consent process.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DRUG;
MIFEPRISTONE;
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COGNITION;
COMPREHENSION;
FEMALE;
FEMINISM;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
FREEDOM;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION;
INDUCED ABORTION;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MINORITY GROUP;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONNEL;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PROBABILITY;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
RISK;
STANDARD;
UNCERTAINTY;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
AUSTRALIA;
COGNITION;
COMMUNICATION;
COMPREHENSION;
DISCLOSURE;
FEMALE;
FEMINISM;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
FREEDOM;
HIV SEROPOSITIVITY;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MIFEPRISTONE;
MINORITY GROUPS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PROBABILITY;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
RISK;
UNCERTAINTY;
WOMEN;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0031082687
PISSN: 08875367
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00025.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (0)
|