Oviposition site selection: Unresponsiveness of Drosophila to cues of potential thermal stress

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 585-588

  Feder, Martin E ^a   Blair, Nathaniel ^b   Figueras, Hunter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILIDAE;

OVIPOSITION; SITE SELECTION; THERMAL STRESS;

EID: 0031082118     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0333     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Atkinson W. D. A field investigation of larval competition in domesticDrosophila. J. Anim. Ecol. 48:1979;91-102.
2. Bernays E. A., Chapman R. F. Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. 1994;Chapman & Hall, New York.
3. Courtney S. P., Kibota T. T. Mother doesn't know best: selection of hosts by ovipositing insects. Insect-Plant Interactions. 1989;CRC Press, Boca Raton.
4. David J. R., Allemand R., Van Herrewege J., Cohet Y. Ecophysiology: abiotic factors. Ashburner M., Carson H. L., Thompson J. N. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. 1983;Academic Press, London.
5. Feder M. E. Ecological and evolutionary physiology of stress proteins and the stress response: theDrosophila melanogaster. Johnston I. A., Bennett A. F. Animals and Temperature. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Fogleman J. Oviposition site preference for temperature inD. melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 9:1979;407-412.
7. Hoffmann A. A. Acclimation: increasing survival at a cost. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:1995;1-2.
8. Huey R. B. Physiological consequences of habitat selection. Am. Nat. 137:1991;S91-S115.
9. Jones J. S., Coyne J. A., Partridge L. Estimation of the thermal niche ofDrosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 130:1987;83-90.
10. Karr T. L., Mittenthal J. E. Adaptive mech-anisms that accelerate embryonic development. Mittenthal J. E., Baskin A. Drosophila: Principles of Organization in Organisms. 1992;Addison-Wesley, Reading.
11. Kiester A. R., Slatkin M. A strategy of movement and resource utilization. Theor. Pop. Biol. 6:1974;1-20.
12. Kreitman M., Shorrocks B., Dytham C. Genes and ecology: two alternative perspectives usingDrosophila. Berry R. J., Crawford T. J., Hewitt G. M. Genes in Ecology. 1993;Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
13. McKenzie J. A., McKechnie S. W. A comparative study of resource utilization in natural popu-lations ofDrosophila melanogasterD. simulans. Oecologia (Berl.). 40:1979;299-309.
14. Moreteau B., R'Kha S., David J. R. Genetics of a nonoptimal behavior: oviposition preference ofDrosophila mauritiana. Behav. Genet. 24:1994;433-441.
15. Nylin S., Janz N. Oviposition preference and larval performance inPolygonia c-album. Ecol. Entomol. 18:1993;394-398.
16. Papaj D.R. Use and avoidance of occupied hosts as a dynamic process in tephritid flies. Bernays E. A. Insect-Plant Interactions. 1994;CRC Press, Boca Raton.
17. Partridge L., Barrie B., Fowler K., French V. Evolution and deveopment of body size and cell size inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 48:1995;1269-1276.
18. Rosenzweig M. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Am. Nat. 137:1991;S5-S28.
19. Schnebel E. M., Grossfield J. Oviposition temperature range in fourDrosophila. Am. Midl. Nat. 116:1986;25-35.
20. Thomson J. N., Pellmyr O. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. A. Rev. Entomol. 36:1991;65-89.
21. Zamudio K. R., Huey R. B., Crill W. D. Bigger isn't always better: body size, developmental and parental temperature, and territorial success inDrosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 49:1995;671-677.