A national survey of current legislative and policy trends in gifted education: Life after the national excellence report

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 352-371

  Landrum, Mary S ^a   Katsiyannis, Antonis ^b   DeWaard, Jan ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT KEARNEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031081842     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016235329802100306     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Callahan, C. (1992). Determining the effectiveness of educational services: Assessment issues. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 416)
2. Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1992). Report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
3. Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted (1994). The 1994 state of the states gifted and talented education report. Austin, TX: Author.
4. Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted (1996). The 1996 state of the states gifted and talented education report. Austin, TX: Author.
5. Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Fetterman, D. M. (1988). Excellence and equality. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7. Ford, D. Y., Russo, C. J., & Harris, J. J. (1994). Meeting the educational needs of the gifted: A legal imperative. Roeper Review, 17, 224-228.
8. Hanby, D. M., & Badiali, B. J. (1994). Fairfield City School District's gifted and talented program: A collaborative evaluation study (1978-1994). Fairfield, OH: Fairfield City School District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 473)
9. Karnes, F. A., & Whorton, J. E. (1991). Teacher certification and endorsement in gifted education: Past, present, and future. Gifted Child Quarterly 35, 148-150.
10. MacRae, L., & Lupart, J. L. (1991). Issues in identifying gifted students: How Renzulli's model stacks up. Roeper Review, 14(1), 53-58.
11. Milgram, R. M. ( 1989). Teaching gifted and talented learners in regular classrooms. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
12. Plowman, P. D. (1987, August). The rise and demise of gifted education in California. Paper presented at the Seventh World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, Salt Lake City, UT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 753)
13. Rhodes, L. (1992). Focusing attention on the individual in identification of gifted black students. Roeper Review, 14(Z), 108-110.
14. Richert, E. S. (1987). Rampant problems and promising practices in the identification of disadvantaged gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 135-137.
15. Stile, S., & Hudson, B. (1993). Early intervention with children who are gifted: DEC recommended practices. Council for Exceptional Children, Division for Early Childhood. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 268)
16. Stinespring, J. A. (1991). The quest to find an alternative way to identify artistic talent in black students. Roeper Review, 14(1), 59-62.
17. U.S. Department of Education (U.S. DOE). (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Whitmore, J. R. (1988). Educational reform and gifted education: From the perspective of a dean. Roeper Review, 10, 197-200.
19. Zirkel, P. A., & Stevens, P. L. (1987). The law concerning public education of gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 305-322.